IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery

Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net> Wed, 01 October 2014 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ross@eircom.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEAF1ACE84 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZDQmvVwfeSef for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail09.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mail09.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EFB6A1ACE7B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24166 messnum 5485339 invoked from network[213.94.190.14/avas02.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net]); 1 Oct 2014 16:52:51 -0000
Received: from avas02.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (213.94.190.14) by mail09.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 24166) with SMTP; 1 Oct 2014 16:52:51 -0000
Received: from mac1.home.ross.net ([159.134.196.35]) by avas02.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net with Cloudmark Gateway id xssn1o00J0mJ9Tz01ssqJ5; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 17:52:51 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5606D7BD-0C2E-42BE-96AF-1D56FCBF41C9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <2D29C51862222E49B991EF64EEB0B5B745F8A7A7@OPE10MB05.tp.gk.corp.tepenet>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 17:52:40 +0100
Message-Id: <72D3BE66-C5D2-4DF2-895B-3030245ABEF6@eircom.net>
References: <201409191147.s8JBl1Zv016462@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <CAPi140NOLH5XuDvj+ymO_8pGCjTE3vf8mPh2zzN+5fpykF_pYA@mail.gmail.com> <78e3cec1.169cf.148a76af091.Coremail.lilishan48@126.com> <CAKD1Yr09x22vo_9G2UquOxopqi=HKZiWFFx1E+2Nmhr7_0J2hw@mail.gmail.com> <5422BE4E.1040601@fud.no> <CAKD1Yr03umUxaqGMdA4EYw6JCo8VdOc+Z+EU_0kM2Mtx8i05zw@mail.gmail.com> <5422E1EE.7020202@fud.no> <CAKD1Yr2CW-aYksGpBuwCEEZVZTc797uwvsFjMkouyZEQ7R-MXw@mail.gmail.com> <5422FA4F.3080003@fud.no> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303BBAE5B@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <2D29C51862222E49B991EF64EEB0B5B745F8A501@OPE10MB05.tp.gk.corp.tepenet> <CAKD1Yr079nY3=UzGm7BOqorDNdzXCz2jF+HtH46rmQPRfmKgzQ@mail.gmail.com> <2D29C51862222E49B991EF64EEB0B5B745F8A7A7@OPE10MB05.tp.gk.corp.tepenet>
To: Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/owqZ-t2NMMzLcx6_LHEJ4w2GxUg
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, "draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery@tools.ietf.org" <draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery@tools.ietf.org>, Kossut Tomasz - Hurt <Tomasz.Kossut@orange.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:52:56 -0000

Is this an issue only seen from tethered hosts in the 64share/RFC 7278 case or have you also seen apps on the UE with the problem?

BR
Ross

On 1 Oct 2014, at 10:37, Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com> wrote:

> http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/9741229.page
>  
> maybe is more application like this above.
>  
> BR,
> Mcz
>  
>  
> From: Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lorenzo@google.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 5:47 AM
> To: Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt
> Cc: Heatley, Nick; Tore Anderson; Metschulat, Holger (holger.metschulat@telekom.de); draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery@tools.ietf.org; v6ops@ietf.org WG; Kossut Tomasz - Hurt
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery
>  
> Can you provide examples of what does not work with DNS64?
>  
> In fact, that would be useful to document in an informational document.
>  
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com> wrote:
> OPL use APN IPv6-only for all services we have, but some mobile operators use different APN for tethering. Why ?
> 
> if we apply the architecture CLAT+PLAT+DNS we can achieve quality of service like in DS, with DNS64 NOT.
> 
> BR,
> Mcz
>  
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email