IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery

Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com> Thu, 02 October 2014 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9841A028A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 02:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.736
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.736 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_PL=1.135, HOST_EQ_PL=1.95, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEE5WL1r6JLH for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 02:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailin.tpsa.pl (mailout.tpsa.pl [212.160.172.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (112/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52BE71A0276 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 02:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 10.236.62.137 (EHLO OPE10HT03.tp.gk.corp.tepenet) ([10.236.62.137]) by mailin.tpsa.pl (MOS 4.4.2a-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id COC10612; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:45:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com>
To: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery
Thread-Index: AQHP0/+IfJWdndvPc0W8NTzcZ4VQIJwIh4kAgAeEHQCAAAKgAIAAFLQAgAADCQCAACdvAIAAAqUAgAAaa4CAAQJyAIAB8XFwgAJ16YCABToFsIAAWF8AgAE4SKA=
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:45:45 +0000
Message-ID: <2D29C51862222E49B991EF64EEB0B5B745F8AA6F@OPE10MB05.tp.gk.corp.tepenet>
References: <201409191147.s8JBl1Zv016462@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <CAPi140NOLH5XuDvj+ymO_8pGCjTE3vf8mPh2zzN+5fpykF_pYA@mail.gmail.com> <78e3cec1.169cf.148a76af091.Coremail.lilishan48@126.com> <CAKD1Yr09x22vo_9G2UquOxopqi=HKZiWFFx1E+2Nmhr7_0J2hw@mail.gmail.com> <5422BE4E.1040601@fud.no> <CAKD1Yr03umUxaqGMdA4EYw6JCo8VdOc+Z+EU_0kM2Mtx8i05zw@mail.gmail.com> <5422E1EE.7020202@fud.no> <CAKD1Yr2CW-aYksGpBuwCEEZVZTc797uwvsFjMkouyZEQ7R-MXw@mail.gmail.com> <5422FA4F.3080003@fud.no> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303BBAE5B@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <2D29C51862222E49B991EF64EEB0B5B745F8A501@OPE10MB05.tp.gk.corp.tepenet> <CAKD1Yr079nY3=UzGm7BOqorDNdzXCz2jF+HtH46rmQPRfmKgzQ@mail.gmail.com> <2D29C51862222E49B991EF64EEB0B5B745F8A7A7@OPE10MB05.tp.gk.corp.tepenet> <72D3BE66-C5D2-4DF2-895B-3030245ABEF6@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <72D3BE66-C5D2-4DF2-895B-3030245ABEF6@eircom.net>
Accept-Language: pl-PL, en-US
Content-Language: pl-PL
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [126.13.107.45]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2D29C51862222E49B991EF64EEB0B5B745F8AA6FOPE10MB05tpgkco_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/50, refid=2.7.2:2014.10.2.90018:17:8.317, ip=, rules=__HAS_FROM, FROM_NAME_PHRASE, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __IMS_MSGID, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __IN_REP_TO, WEBMAIL_XOIP, __HAS_XOIP, __CT, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __MIME_VERSION, WEBMAIL_X_IP_HDR, __ANY_URI, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, ECARD_KNOWN_DOMAINS, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __HTML_FONT_BLUE, __HAS_HTML, BODY_SIZE_10000_PLUS, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, __STYLE_RATWARE_NEG, __URI_NS, HTML_70_90, WEBMAIL_SOURCE, MULTIPLE_RCPTS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mailin.tpsa.pl
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0C0203.542D1ECB.005E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2012-12-31 09:39:00, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32, mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0C0203.542D1ECB.005E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2012-12-31 09:39:00, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: b21e99559804b25f5713c1d1a2f2b032
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/KBmIc6byedLTQCOgz6AUMxR1qxU
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, "draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery@tools.ietf.org" <draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery@tools.ietf.org>, Kossut Tomasz - Hurt <Tomasz.Kossut@orange.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:46:05 -0000

Origin client run on PC with windows only, so it’s tethering.

BR,
Mcz

From: Ross Chandler [mailto:ross@eircom.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 6:53 PM
To: Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti; v6ops@ietf.org WG; draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery@tools.ietf.org; Tore Anderson; Kossut Tomasz - Hurt
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery

Is this an issue only seen from tethered hosts in the 64share/RFC 7278 case or have you also seen apps on the UE with the problem?

BR
Ross

On 1 Oct 2014, at 10:37, Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com<mailto:Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com>> wrote:


http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/9741229.page

maybe is more application like this above.

BR,
Mcz


From: Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lorenzo@google.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 5:47 AM
To: Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt
Cc: Heatley, Nick; Tore Anderson; Metschulat, Holger (holger.metschulat@telekom.de<mailto:holger.metschulat@telekom.de>); draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery@tools.ietf.org>; v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> WG; Kossut Tomasz - Hurt
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery

Can you provide examples of what does not work with DNS64?

In fact, that would be useful to document in an informational document.

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com<mailto:Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com>> wrote:
OPL use APN IPv6-only for all services we have, but some mobile operators use different APN for tethering. Why ?

if we apply the architecture CLAT+PLAT+DNS we can achieve quality of service like in DS, with DNS64 NOT.

BR,
Mcz

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email