[v6ops] Re: New version of proposed charter

[Tim Chown <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

On 19/09/2025, 02:24, "Owen DeLong" <owen=[e-mail]> wrote:



> On Sep 18, 2025, at 05:52, Jen Linkova <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi Ron, XiPeng, Nick,
>
> Thank you, for working on it, I think the charter looks good!
> I have a few minor comments.
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:20 AM Ron Bonica
> <rbonica=[e-mail]> wrote:
>>   *  Publish documents that demonstrate how IPv6 can be deployed in a
>>      specific environment.  Environments include, but are not limited
>>      to, data centers and enterprises.  They may also include WANs and
>>      access networks.
>
> A minor nit: should we phrase it as
> "Publish documents that demonstrate how IPv6 can be deployed in a
> specific environment, such as data centers, enterprise networks, WAN,
> access networks etc”
> ?
>
+1

Yes, a better way to put it.


>>   *  Publish use cases of AI LLMs assisting IPv6 education and
>>      deployment (e.g., answering IPv6 questions, offering address-
>>      planning guidance, drafting lab test configurations).  The goal is
>>      to lighten network administrators' workload - not replace them.
>
> To be honest I'm not sure how this is in scope for v6ops...it's not
> like I have a very strong opinion,  but it doesn't sound like a
> direction we should be going to..
+1

Indeed, the AI/LLM perspective here is out of scope for v6ops and needs to be removed.  It doesn’t matter whether a human or LLM operator is following published guidance. The charter is ample long enough as is.

Tim