IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers - Load Balancer

Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> Wed, 29 July 2020 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBED23A0E1C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7JP_6u_rt8RD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0829E3A0E16 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id qc22so7787661ejb.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=R0tZaJsjWKlXEy3m5wrTkRPdJRY4ZnfeaqWZZmcSDfs=; b=SV/0wGZpO6DfIJzj4PYhMwh5W3Tu5anjvy1eijmWDKTw+qbGHbmjTSxhMEKqn2Oxg2 XHcYHpBTSP6IVTVzDZWz8F4IF6lP93ds4Yu62c4EBPTepJnEuzj5VbbWv9ZMLpFbSx9m pyQ9KIFIWQEPEIPkmTSZueqkz9yaOvMwa1JqfzBhr702bP2zHmWJCnEBZucIos5/Mr7U RpxlW5eLOdWHjMz0LuB5/ezkBoIZj1kcof2RRlNgLbSqCKv5QG+ptWTdX9XtQSRCUvmp 89C2istyoBey2b3J7oTTZPoooZ8lsywLK+DzBcktKadsdiiX/YY2MqpMSXOOZqDNXhvs RECA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R0tZaJsjWKlXEy3m5wrTkRPdJRY4ZnfeaqWZZmcSDfs=; b=DuOrKgm5gPNbmPW6XCOt+BhI8SoPFrBUPTAA+lpCbeTUsKozHY+MMNRCfE0JQ0svEx JOCSr8gytbPe6rN8ONpadF7axgv9U1PzE145745XDXJQpPWMrRsOyxYl92uGmTJGV5Zc L/ZElJRpOULTPKpHiNgNHjtXXeASvhNHfdQgOv1Lh+6O8l95xqw1Dl18eBo0iFYRpifw tVD8oKHoRsQhsWLqK2S1R+fACtBWbp1kbhVzv+YNmbeHFDCc/HbHyV0409r+SmXBCIgP 1Q/VYdO+vwbR1v4Kps3ulLRgHYfig2uU0LqDha/IVQ+qe8//K/TdYq4a1No3t0WiINmY sD5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533p0iCmHrQcfnoDVgNdxIi0CsZGM3N25tO7NtUlqV1gkPpPtwBf 4H1OfV040ewnVUlDK61KyAbqB1cECigBaYAzzJ9hRw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKyKneW/C3DnkaXPmFJqalKeT4OTKAeGxbBK3Y/iD6KIkAu3L0P0X4h3Objoxa63Bi21UKbSjrH8FaV5d05lI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a242:: with SMTP id bi2mr27275976ejb.243.1595985623395; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b380408712364589a45ab9f39ab6f764@huawei.com> <CALx6S35rkA5nVPm6C6MToUdHKFmcAabGfMN9prTiUfWr+GKwCA@mail.gmail.com> <6439ceb9d73b435d950e73a7a2d68fc7@huawei.com> <CALx6S37ih8VabN2PHvQ3ELDvV2DoiUqnd28LRxr4ofj6zUq3Jw@mail.gmail.com> <947a50398cbb4bbcad85462a69d7dd45@huawei.com> <CALx6S35FX-SNoNFhd2JXFio9B0vGVyXGkeob=7x+dn6u4qOaVw@mail.gmail.com> <42B3046E-6157-4460-A10B-F13E299340B6@apnic.net> <4720fdaa-71b6-4816-e800-938c01a30abb@gmail.com> <CALx6S342x_u4pLD5DpYKh=_u1e0dLujgrmoxfKpeuE5SbZerEA@mail.gmail.com> <DF21C4FD-C2FB-44D8-A24B-82D389C23984@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <DF21C4FD-C2FB-44D8-A24B-82D389C23984@apnic.net>
From: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:20:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CALx6S34AafYgJ=iuNRbZmuVuFctYQgsWCqn6PkyLAkMKGqQE6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops@ietf.org" <draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000026444b05ab8a5c40"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pdp5jKaGYlOgo5BCj5V1o-xeKrg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers - Load Balancer
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 01:20:27 -0000

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020, 5:45 PM Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote:

>
>
> > On 29 Jul 2020, at 9:50 am, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:
> >
> …
>
> >
> > I agree. My feedback on the APNIC guidance  ….
>
>
> Oh please - APNIC publishes a blog that solicits contributions, and
> says clearly at the end of each of these articles: "The views expressed
> by the authors of this blog are their own and do not necessarily reflect
> the views of APNIC.”
>

Thanks for the clarification!


> APNIC as a regional address registry has no views one way or the other
> as to what folk do with Extension Headers in IPv6 packets.
>
> Geoff
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email