IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers - Load Balancer

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Wed, 29 July 2020 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B674E3A0EFE; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7yZzTzAPxny; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A548D3A0E5C; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 06TL6BYr097023 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:06:12 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8] claimed to be crumpet.local
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops@ietf.org" <draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops@ietf.org>
References: <b380408712364589a45ab9f39ab6f764@huawei.com> <CALx6S35rkA5nVPm6C6MToUdHKFmcAabGfMN9prTiUfWr+GKwCA@mail.gmail.com> <6439ceb9d73b435d950e73a7a2d68fc7@huawei.com> <CALx6S37ih8VabN2PHvQ3ELDvV2DoiUqnd28LRxr4ofj6zUq3Jw@mail.gmail.com> <947a50398cbb4bbcad85462a69d7dd45@huawei.com> <CALx6S35FX-SNoNFhd2JXFio9B0vGVyXGkeob=7x+dn6u4qOaVw@mail.gmail.com> <42B3046E-6157-4460-A10B-F13E299340B6@apnic.net> <4720fdaa-71b6-4816-e800-938c01a30abb@gmail.com> <CALx6S342x_u4pLD5DpYKh=_u1e0dLujgrmoxfKpeuE5SbZerEA@mail.gmail.com> <d6cc0f77-151f-060f-54f0-2987597ff11f@si6networks.com> <32d99263-7176-3188-b9d2-72a67c6ed3d6@gmail.com> <d2beec78-4d21-1583-db30-0753dcceebe1@si6networks.com> <CALx6S35PTX_0uUS-11f8C9rxuuMEC+gq9H_ERjnLRmD2u6nXww@mail.gmail.com> <f978ac40-c40d-900e-28d0-9f052392b224@foobar.org> <EC78F382-18AA-4957-90D6-0605EA694D56@apnic.net>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <7bc3e01f-4f65-da52-46a0-9d24fe343c1d@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:06:10 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.24
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EC78F382-18AA-4957-90D6-0605EA694D56@apnic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/vI0thpg_Nv7iKhKpNZL2VpBNC0c>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers - Load Balancer
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:06:25 -0000

Geoff Huston wrote on 29/07/2020 21:54:
> Next?

next would be quantifying in cases where EHs are passed, how many EHs 
might, or mightn't get through.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email