[v6ops] Review solicitation - draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix

Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Wed, 27 February 2013 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6365921F8726 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:22:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.128
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.128 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e7pdXpt0p2yc for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:22:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8D421F872E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AOV21025; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:22:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:22:02 +0000
Received: from SZXEML419-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.158) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:22:07 +0000
Received: from szxeml545-mbx.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.45]) by szxeml419-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.158]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:22:04 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Review solicitation - draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix
Thread-Index: Ac4UmZxJgYKThVy5TOeV8GZlgLA+sg==
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:22:03 +0000
Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923A00DFFB@szxeml545-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.145]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "ian.farrer@telekom.de" <ian.farrer@telekom.de>, sunqiong <sunqiong@ctbri.com.cn>
Subject: [v6ops] Review solicitation - draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:22:15 -0000

Hi, all v6ops,

We have submitted a new version draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix, "A Framework for Semantic IPv6 Prefix and Gap Analysis" (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix). It is describes a framework that embeds semantics into IPv6 prefixes, so that network operators can efficiently manage their network traffic based on these explicit semantics.

This document was once presented in v6ops @ ietf84, Vancouver. There was many discussions and interests was expressed. After that, we have rewritten the document largely along with two new co-authors from China Telecom and Deutsche Telecom.

The authors believe it is useful work and operators can benefit from such network planning/management.

Please read the draft and comment. Your reviewing is important for us to improve the document.

A companion draft "Use case of IPv6 prefix semantics for operators" (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sun-v6ops-semantic-usecase) has also been submitted to v6ops WG. It describes more specific use case for telecommunication operators.

Best regards,

Sheng