Re: [v6ops] why IPv6 EHs in the Real World

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 10 April 2015 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79B31A88C6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8wvV3rIJ7hQi for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506871A88C4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by paboj16 with SMTP id oj16so32070213pab.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=V+p8BxT44ktLy8NfzqY2ivthCvZCSv3DNFc+6G2zYak=; b=yztscdDOQybrZz25l3Y6gT+KpNgCnSf3svAg2RrMesxpqnq8CyQwZjeb0mwdfiD/66 Bj5+cHxXOeykaQC+aGNsjycPOXNo08iCjLIFq4qG8JgfIijblMRCfbBd8avpEY5BPQe+ +sUO/MgabMnhfXg3fvQ6PqQhH/aiy6l2rrhtvv6Vcy/TNcLc0MXDO5vgqTchtQQYCZHI yrEjx2VbUZlm/fIjBly1zsF8y9wSRhqdGHsu+yMQLl1cUkgKsz8FD59ktNTQJEQRp1/z rK7YslBnpzYbfQoFuV0WrK1SgMeh7anD4MguRMOsC0xm4mrF7/Bruob/Q2OkxYVdutSj MGZw==
X-Received: by 10.66.237.35 with SMTP id uz3mr5789979pac.46.1428698129065; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:7e03:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:7e03:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dk5sm3131388pdb.88.2015.04.10.13.35.26 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55283418.5090108@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 08:35:36 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <52C91C37-7214-4EFD-A0DD-F0842CB45D2E@merike.com> <CAFU7BAQSeWTQD+gUkBa4bOFCNtETWZkydGPPmLsKC-UAnFrcJQ@mail.gmail.com> <1E9D679E-2EF3-47FC-941A-EBA13162E2FA@merike.com> <CO2PR04MB5855ACD7FE8C1057FCED231FE090@CO2PR04MB585.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <5515628D.7020306@gmail.com> <237B7808-F457-42FE-9298-53E9181358E8@cisco.com> <55161E85.8020806@gmail.com> <5523A0D7.2010509@gmail.com> <20150407093213.GJ54385@Space.Net> <5523AC2F.6070802@gmail.com> <20150407123653.GS54385@Space.Net> <5526E4ED.3020405@gmail.com> <5526EA10.7040804@foobar.org> <55271231.1010405@gmail.com> <5527FA6B.8020506@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <5527FA6B.8020506@foobar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/uSeK6F7NI5V0sIQ3vsz_fswR8nA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] why IPv6 EHs in the Real World
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 20:35:31 -0000

On 11/04/2015 04:29, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 10/04/2015 00:58, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> On 10/04/2015 09:07, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>>> products are designed to a budget and a performance spec.  There's no point
>>> in building a router which will inspect 65536 byte packets for EH chains if
>>> it's too expensive for anyone to buy, or if it trashes performance by
>>> passing packets with headers that big.  There is always a
>>> cost/speed/features compromise.
>>
>> Of course. But we already changed the standard to limit this problem:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7112
> 
> a policy cannot change reality.  At best it can hope to complement it.

True. But fixing our specs and encouraging implementers to do the
right thing are the only tools the IETF has.

    Brian