IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] why IPv6 EHs in the Real World

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 07 April 2015 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032CE1B3382 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 02:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UeCAG9ft_pPJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 02:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [195.30.115.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642871B3380 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 02:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215226010D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:32:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D67686291A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:32:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 72370 invoked by uid 1007); 7 Apr 2015 11:32:13 +0200
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 11:32:13 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150407093213.GJ54385@Space.Net>
References: <DDC70DDD-58A8-4B94-8F6B-E0FC339BB916@merike.com> <D13982C9.40CCA%evyncke@cisco.com> <52C91C37-7214-4EFD-A0DD-F0842CB45D2E@merike.com> <CAFU7BAQSeWTQD+gUkBa4bOFCNtETWZkydGPPmLsKC-UAnFrcJQ@mail.gmail.com> <1E9D679E-2EF3-47FC-941A-EBA13162E2FA@merike.com> <CO2PR04MB5855ACD7FE8C1057FCED231FE090@CO2PR04MB585.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <5515628D.7020306@gmail.com> <237B7808-F457-42FE-9298-53E9181358E8@cisco.com> <55161E85.8020806@gmail.com> <5523A0D7.2010509@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5523A0D7.2010509@gmail.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/vmR7srzuqwjCW5W0Brv959V-u48>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] why IPv6 EHs in the Real World
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:32:20 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:18:15AM +0200, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> For these reasons, I still suppose data carrying operators have all
> reasons to filter RHs altogether.

The only halfway acceptable reason is "I need to drop RH0, but have
stupid gear that cannot differenciate, so either drop-all or drop-none".

(Yes, this happens for brand new top-of-the-line gear...)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status