[v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04.txt

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 20 December 2011 07:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C495111E80D8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:49:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CEjhE6u8sC0L for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:49:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A7E11E80A2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by laah2 with SMTP id h2so2719519laa.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:49:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references :to:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=05aGRwKz7QEt+bd9t7bWKWB1tuBJGhlipXerW90P8E0=; b=CLa3KMXOEvd4xUqFGkToH0Jzg9rsvNY6wBhUlE2u56ci3tAAVROp5zgCdXZ97S/e7/ WHwFI2iwtGCn72WO4IPTN29ls4MXmC3oaNJX0INf8IK1BRTImWNGcFB/WnRr/aRg6Lil s0xOknd/vml10DF8Zj8Ek59r0b+gHMkBBrNmg=
Received: by 10.152.102.136 with SMTP id fo8mr694077lab.30.1324367364864; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a83-245-212-5.elisa-laajakaista.fi (a83-245-212-5.elisa-laajakaista.fi. [83.245.212.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id st7sm762946lab.12.2011.12.19.23.49.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:49:23 -0800 (PST)
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:49:20 +0200
References: <20111220073924.5093.19864.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org Operations" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <422FF86C-4C27-4C0A-9A5B-F445766220DD@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:49:26 -0000

Hemant, all,

We added the applicability statement into the Introduction, which now states the pd-exclude is intended for deployments where CEs are on their own layer 2 domain. This should clear your concern on 'multicast RAs".

- Jouni


Begin forwarded message:

> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Date: December 20, 2011 9:39:24 AM GMT+02:00
> To: jouni.nospam@gmail.com
> Cc: ot@cisco.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, teemu.savolainen@nokia.com
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04.txt
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Jouni Korhonen and posted to the IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude
> Revision:	 04
> Title:		 Prefix Exclude Option for DHCPv6-based Prefix Delegation
> Creation date:	 2011-12-20
> WG ID:		 dhc
> Number of pages: 10
> 
> Abstract:
>   This specification defines an optional mechanism to allow exclusion
>   of one specific prefix from a delegated prefix set when using DHCPv6-
>   based prefix delegation.  The new mechanism updates RFC 3633.