IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Making RDNSS a MUST?

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Thu, 06 April 2017 00:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3521E1293DA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Nte5Xv1YL0i for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03BEB128C83 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id d188so23767565vka.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 17:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0yIu1v6/1aJHc7J8bZW6KM5AA4Edxj65q3rMo0n9T7w=; b=CbuV8KYQkXPcWE9+uLBEC7CNyI5XaXxnLU5ZcPrF0sPf6TfP4OCa/ZfSOln3lmpjU0 JfLv60k1N3BxapStAtE0xkTKPGwMWbQt1ql3vRozi1goZdINAWNHfnCiia+f/HBkHWXl lyTvEiwJRwS2vj5nvXzTOcvVdWymWyLUgrJ2+3bq9epotaHiupASPBrr4GsSYq+KuTXS JWoc/t2Yh0L8hqHfcSFBDVV+dfrzeya4rq24OMX6GA5YQWPXHB9dm1nS7j0qr2+08YNk pz8XCknfe4wwd/1lnLmKsQkev8tk909rPV/GMc0yeju3mttysEAbkeUTKrGAu+T4eJyp VQXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0yIu1v6/1aJHc7J8bZW6KM5AA4Edxj65q3rMo0n9T7w=; b=En8cctmepb4N1QU+v9bmnTE7f9xMwxRCbRGnZUIIVZTArRiRYIEc4EubZpJ90NwRsf t6Ew/Nw4jFWlbhTD57IWOVz7GI4j1I8r+nFAumSO2woPOcuKlwdbk2DXYmsjIyqtoUVp zWQARB2pRQ7nKfLj/Vwvy/x9y8Z+Swk14TKwzleSfJg807UFhc5qCEINsk4b+nlYP1Hg oMy0uhUZ2Yig1yPH8mFTf10tchaYZVmSfgzEcHdSayJr1+/nSbm9IND9EFZjAGLx5S3Y LkeHcluEZ6GkvTXJtGeWBqgZkx7kjDzFXBVMGfqGvwojQivx2yftQUCQKtIDY0I51LBp CNRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0jSNzFyxY+QvLIN8EjunglK68FVtpoX1GJup/LblOCewspKH/JkybmxnmWbAa2v4PQHGqFiVKrS7kSqA==
X-Received: by 10.31.67.209 with SMTP id q200mr14603291vka.43.1491437388029; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 17:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.84.20 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:dc0:a000:4:d9d1:217a:5ec2:b6cf]
In-Reply-To: <F9129888-80A1-4DE1-BAE0-A7CB7AC28B62@fugue.com>
References: <CAKD1Yr2FMvpgjSPv-1cdWQGTFzB8oRCvm=57MgOv=tH11awpOA@mail.gmail.com> <6778e48f-250e-30ca-6d57-a8d87c8f0dd6@dougbarton.us> <73E59C4C-AC31-4456-B807-CE92490A5D51@thehobsons.co.uk> <7063c729-70f5-40b0-51b2-1d89bb28d7c0@dougbarton.us> <DE5EF8D8-A1FF-4CAF-A0D8-6AAF60FBD4E8@delong.com> <ec45051d-caf4-0675-f696-711dea582dbd@dougbarton.us> <bc6862bf-0cff-dc78-bd54-a5d85771c4dd@gmail.com> <2ff28a1e-f11f-b924-8105-4f4de4e1804a@dougbarton.us> <CAKD1Yr17EL2zv7REPxT5UM9bO7A4io7F0v995JDEULZM_n_exg@mail.gmail.com> <a844c9e3-0f72-6353-5634-a380bb1850ed@gmail.com> <58E253B4.9010501@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2zi4rBZ1QCJ9MBQnvXJX1_1QpMQphT7Nxbo4QB1Jxot5w@mail.gmail.com> <m1cv4MA-0000HqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704031844212.27978@uplift.swm.pp.se> <EA4E5D14-B503-4287-B35C-17ECF65CCC44@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr3bNdw92+j85MxKwjSem82yKOrD_pLpZT=gffXRgT+GCg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfXJG+-CXZnOaeerKZMpk-TnZxgv=onJSudX6oYQBo7_w@mail.gmail.com> <m1cvhA2-0000G1C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <914B3454-58A4-4130-8B90-6371100D619D@fugue.com> <CAN-Dau1=9HXni9XydcWOO6r8SKrOeOXfqo=Vx=NUoNtUze8dfA@mail.gmail.com> <F94218CB-2F61-42D1-AFBC-8F2F18264C4F@fugue.com> <CAN-Dau3KpVyyVZZcM26+SN867XF+SnsC7vj2TQww2m-CUs9YuQ@mail.gmail.com> <3125FCC8-F68D-418F-920D-8FBE5D34C840@fugue.com> <CAN-Dau0UGKt7zWXcE32nNyV5zWJOE=UMRarSCfz32TY76k+9tQ@mail.gmail.com> <AD69F296-54EE-4898-885D-D8A1B9ABC25C@fugue.com> <CAN-Dau3DVsJSeh0BZieYd6ePdnXm+v-ohBpZ===d=0opJthEWQ@mail.gmail.com> <F9129888-80A1-4DE1-BAE0-A7CB7AC28B62@fugue.com>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 10:09:47 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn0PTEkqzX29HMuWxCGBkSG83vr5AuR2vG6dXev8ShP+oA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ufPp9V_dR4NxwWAuVpKtJQiLC_A>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Making RDNSS a MUST?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:09:51 -0000

I'd be heading to 'MUST implement, SHOULD be configurable MAY be
turned off by default' type choices.

* it has to be there as a choice, to be able to meet the client
single-implement logic
* it has to be controllable but we don't constrain how that works.
maybe people make burned in decisions
* it doesn't have to be the one which is on at boot.

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 4:57 PM, David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> wrote:
>
> We are working on the document, "Requirements for IPv6 Routers"
> draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs-02, and it I think it would be good to get this right
> the first time that why.
>
>
> Right, understood.  So do you know what text to write to require DHCPv6?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email