IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6 PD client on cellular on Android

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Tue, 18 July 2017 09:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E451126E3A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bMD12PEKkYyC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EE50131DD1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v6I9PBdf040428; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:25:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201707180925.v6I9PBdf040428@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:55:10 +0200. <CAPt1N1mW5TxZjw8DW7wEzM0A_cD7=AHAUt10rjNcwAtjJNvJcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:25:11 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wLD4FYU9kSAZ34hdBg_TIIoaGvI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6 PD client on cellular on Android
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:41:46 -0000

 In your previous mail you wrote:

>  I think you can do DHCPv4 on linux without using LPF.   Also possibly on
>  various modern BSDs.   The advanced socket API appears to support this.

=> this is why I added "on some systems". Note it is harder on the client
side, and on the server side with a relay BPF/LBF/... is never required.
Of course this applies only to DHCPv4.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email