IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Call for Discussion draft-palet-v6ops-ipv6-only

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 09 June 2020 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B890D3A08CC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 05:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AHQN_voasjK0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 05:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595203A08CD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 05:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id EF442B2; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:55:28 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1591707328; bh=AdiV9dleIXiSHtO7xNgBQYRcJUos1n7b1Ckbe4Jr0HE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=s42QtA8BZP17EI7X67fShep1yVceub/zBgKUI4YsgoCfYyVK7YIFThJok/F/ZP+Oq A93h/ZywfXLxeBAnAw2Lh8vbY4JzlycdzmWs0+2phAg27adgRBn1k1+OQVPTYle2/i 1/EdHhoEXjAiyANbTGdpAM+nU0LvNiQND5C7KWjU=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5B4B1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:55:28 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:55:28 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR05MB6348F5472AE8FE5937D18A23AE850@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2006091451550.29463@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <DM6PR05MB6348F5472AE8FE5937D18A23AE850@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wddVc1ov15IdzU66Ve3UHJzXXTw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Call for Discussion draft-palet-v6ops-ipv6-only
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:55:36 -0000

On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, Ron Bonica wrote:

> Folks,
>
>
>
> Each week between now and IETF week, we will review and discuss one draft with an eye towards progressing it.
>
>
>
> This week, please review and comment on draft-palet-v6ops-ipv6-only.

I think it would be good if we could come up with some terms that cause 
less confusion when discussing different solutions. So this draft has an 
embryo for that, but I think it would be good if there were some examples.

So let's say I want to describe a mobile access with IPv6 only WAN that 
supports 464xlat? What is that then? "dual stack LAN with transitional 
464xlat-enabled router with IPv6 only WAN and NAT64 function in the 
network"?

That's still long and cumbersome...?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email