Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 12 February 2016 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB151A854C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:25:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FSZBzjnsEURS for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:25:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com (mail-yw0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E01C1A8034 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:25:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id q190so69850620ywd.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:25:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=iVSMdB3W8CthQ3TS6Rmu/RENSMKDYm33BuT8JOZR0c0=; b=HwBveprUzHUJcUPm2Mk2yukeu8c/WKEOwR1zW2O22IAc+tuHbCSvL6BtwB1dlSUNgV N4WgEEF+9aqqKABbGUVe28KCdQjRj3xubbvSQSU7WN/qnqCyyqHmhrX7XNmvBlFOeD14 kQcVrwXRKirhRrKN+DJvy+hRrBc9/qs02+i/junPJj+Gqm4sQ8ZUU7iJnQGiGzcMRMUU sJkjI3ncTOaQZJasZVI2bqHvHxi7rnXHoz6b36LdaI/2Qxdon9/iUUsUtP8U61fHyzH3 a8l3rQj06UFmBWDxbLNkbbkR/bcC/KdJ4a/Bwssav7YJv69kbxMUL2ISNzcohnposM5V pZaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=iVSMdB3W8CthQ3TS6Rmu/RENSMKDYm33BuT8JOZR0c0=; b=iYBaFpJa41migSYMNJSxHMmJf/nQcNaJOgg7us4axXVEdINEIKUFsJlt88Jw9EayNd kHgqRdqdk58gBKziOxEzOStz3Y8deVAXErNyGNZwOVhIFEq37F0AAGZHS6aT6a7DY5n/ ffeqC39uIWFKaKDJXy6oJGwczEVV4eJlmdrZ963oBpvqFNH1RC9wvgTD9QvOzZgrXAjY JjREUTPh0pGHA5M1YBtU3pDlZEuQZQqGUlq3tmumwTAKBFJZ12xwZHF7tvdg4LqG9lhn e4X/el9Z0q4KAGE8y/rpp3NHFEW/LtTDcpAm+s9Ud8lZ6J/YNHak0xZfK/zFQYDPtJId RRoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOReE3wcW1Tv+lUDEgtVYnkwIN6PW8d4likYN25N5uJGLz6IXEVAls97suHmAWkJOygLQJwzxPs3Q3GYkSMZ
X-Received: by 10.13.202.16 with SMTP id m16mr1667137ywd.160.1455297939320; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:25:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.13.204 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:25:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160212171911.30069.45855.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160212171911.30069.45855.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:25:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1yKpcNeaM=NK35Z_hsYxMF5GOytkdZ6a_eYp=dY4vL1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114f00fab7a7ad052b95f4e5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/y4EN9N7DG3M4rPTZqCI1eaE0DAM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:41 -0000

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:19 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>         Title           : Host address availability recommendations
>         Authors         : Lorenzo Colitti
>                           Vint Cerf
>                           Stuart Cheshire
>                           David Schinazi
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05.txt
>

New in this version:

   1. Placed much less emphasis on DHCPv6 PD. It was never the intention to
   recommend DHCPv6 PD only; the intention was to recommend address
   provisioning mechanisms that provide plenty of addresses (e.g., by
   providing a prefix). However, some WG participants believed that that was
   the intent. The draft now recommends either "methods that allow the host to
   obtain more addresses autonomously" or a dedicated /64 per host, where the
   dedicated /64 per host can be obtained in several ways.
   2. Mention SLAAC with a dedicated /64 for every host as a way of
   providing plenty of addresses via SLAAC with simpler tracking than shared
   SLAAC.
   3. Slightly reworded the section on address tracking.

Cheers,
Lorenzo