IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sat, 13 February 2016 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC161B2E38 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:56:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NkhC0Iik7XP1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:56:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x230.google.com (mail-yk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 188DD1B2E37 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:56:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id z13so43173771ykd.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:56:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=HDMPvuTFy9Do8nXkDMZaIb7w0eAi5EFsIRguP3pb+1U=; b=mIIbLB2veyBZfr8UxMuq5ZlS28rPR9ecBtiVl2+9HNUo5S6TLj0fWqfm9K/Li2nykm gWDB+4y61LSHsvhqxuRdox8QNBvlMYVh24TfC+YChItJs2r43jBd9TSFHgF0U1OpqBDN +yxnbxEKD+82MHgn8XDfFUJuUysc1epyydN3qB3QbbrfH2ziG5dL51icZ6i65hG4I1SQ V4hJIBOzGie3bjJ9rnfaTynFWMptdZ593v+o9mZb6FXXEmkL9AuoYyJoMfKcuxn1JFqp 6cpkng+RAo5va8jYeZM1qMRJHzb7ddKPEbVIOcMQdiCclDGu8L1yc7d5E8wCnJ1Y1gO5 czYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=HDMPvuTFy9Do8nXkDMZaIb7w0eAi5EFsIRguP3pb+1U=; b=SE0YJHxFtGbGqttkRd/QeQ21+gYsW1tYJnST88e5x6KXBCboDmqydyJDyVe0DTC/cx MR+VoqdhZInNAE1mq2Gngr/jxLd9B0Ytnjs0YpXmgPj7HTGeJPPvqsAeQgen4HDehj2i d/ZUeJcUbVkotmSvk/y+Bt7egOGaKI4o/pknMVxJo1Vg4kQXQ4U8J+a3nsczJZOv5Jfo 5ZZkHhzWRK//r45kU0ZU3NBI6NyNvVw7GzYq7ZJV7Shi5Ax2HKGV9tMht4n1e05GScJW ePKJoIFtdbTYWlkjJ7IxSQFvcKZ+LrP8pZgjoZSbR7dg3/gXx+gup44OrnYwQ5VnjTf5 ou4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR4mSWymy8JBr5HS/q1CudUW1ECFHDJoln8EGtyrU+hChxJ9+0bsiVABLA9WojDe3cmnrmv0UpM5E6eGCUO
X-Received: by 10.37.44.69 with SMTP id s66mr3558293ybs.25.1455350182257; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:56:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.13.204 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:56:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56BE2891.3030507@gmail.com>
References: <20160212171911.30069.45855.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr1yKpcNeaM=NK35Z_hsYxMF5GOytkdZ6a_eYp=dY4vL1w@mail.gmail.com> <56BE2891.3030507@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:56:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3ZRO+xZLmbB5pomPaT_WKb0Xk+G03hk6kU-dZe0Q6zPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11432108a3b404052ba21e4e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/xgOjIZd4JPAesihOAjZpcQzM804>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 07:56:24 -0000

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> >    1. Placed much less emphasis on DHCPv6 PD. It was never the intention
> to
> >    recommend DHCPv6 PD only;
>
> And don't overlook that draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile is in IETF Last
> Call
> for another 2 days, including a strong recommendation against using IA_PD.
>

Thanks for pointing that out (twice now). I commented on that thread. It
seems spurious to recommend against DHCPv6 PD since its anonymity
properties are basically the same as IA_NA.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email