IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-vyncke-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-cookie-00.txt

"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Thu, 30 October 2014 12:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756B61A0024 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBQmrcCW1uLv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.sbone.de (bird.sbone.de [46.4.1.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 820FA1A0037 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA0E25D3A91 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:16:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 817A6C7709C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:16:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de
Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LADMVjqwqrKb for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:16:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4420:cabc:c8ff:fe8b:4fe6] (orange-tun0-ula.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4420:cabc:c8ff:fe8b:4fe6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD377C7709B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:16:29 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <617295AC-ABF0-451C-BA9C-4BEA048DD19A@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:16:28 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B8D9659B-6736-42F9-8208-92B69DF1E53D@lists.zabbadoz.net>
References: <20141027195522.23487.548.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5A5248BF-9E86-4B90-B344-C2DE1A3A8B56@cisco.com> <CAKC-DJhMf72D4wUcSL1_t_mSBLHotNm2KPE4v8OW94wfpHMN5w@mail.gmail.com> <D0771643.30804%evyncke@cisco.com> <CAKC-DJg+G59rjwj-UX0zGj01KLvq9Ark1sL=pVytGT0znC2BmQ@mail.gmail.com> <929CBC54-691A-4D35-AAF5-1F02C7D84073@lists.zabbadoz.net> <617295AC-ABF0-451C-BA9C-4BEA048DD19A@nominum.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/zXoCSUfY6pEZO9D97O977ELPLJs
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-vyncke-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-cookie-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:16:41 -0000

On 29 Oct 2014, at 21:38 , Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Oct 29, 2014, at 5:28 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
>> I would phrase that differently as “I want predictable, deterministic behaviour and not magic”.
> 
> Then you want POTS, not a global packet-switched network.
> 
> :)

Damn that thing still works after so many decades and is so reliable indeed;  now SIP is taking over.

I was more thinking in terms of applications (or more general end-node behaviour), but I wouldn’t mind more simple, deterministic protocol behaviour either;  less can be more;  feature-itis is a disease of its own.  And, personally I guess, if we had more working (deployed) code before we’d have RFCs published on specifications, we’d have a lot less OPs (or ooops) things to write down and deal with and a lot less crap and a lot less drafts making it to RFCs;-)

/bz

— 
Bjoern A. Zeeb             "Come on. Learn, goddamn it.", WarGames, 1983

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email