Re: [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3368)

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 01 October 2012 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841E611E8178 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.571
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xg5TmHUKxn4L for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B1711E8190 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:14b4:17b5:d72a:f2d0]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E49542663; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:33:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <50699B9C.7000504@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:33:16 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <20121001113148.42539B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJ+F4gQNTPRROrvAJeWs89yqrBMCq5rD6EWe5ZTU2iAxsg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+F4gQNTPRROrvAJeWs89yqrBMCq5rD6EWe5ZTU2iAxsg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, steven.ganzer@gmail.com, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3368)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:33:19 -0000

Le 2012-10-01 08:17, Barry Leiba a écrit :
> This looks right, though I know we have a number of problems in the
> examples in 6350.  Simon, should we mark this one "Verified" ?

Yup.

Thanks,
Simon

> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:31 AM, RFC Errata System
> <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6350,
>> "vCard Format Specification".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6350&eid=3368
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Stefan Ganzer <steven.ganzer@gmail.com>
>>
>> Section: 7.1.3
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> BEGIN:VCARD
>> VERSION:4.0
>> EMAIL;PID=4.2,5.1:jdoe@example.com
>> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527
>> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:42bcd5a7-1699-4514-87b4-056edf68e9cc
>> END:VCARD
>>
>> BEGIN:VCARD
>> VERSION:4.0
>> EMAIL;PID=5.1,5.2:john@example.com
>> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:0c75c629-6a8d-4d5e-a07f-1bb35846854d
>> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527
>> END:VCARD
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> BEGIN:VCARD
>> VERSION:4.0
>> FN:J. Doe
>> EMAIL;PID=4.2,5.1:jdoe@example.com
>> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527
>> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:42bcd5a7-1699-4514-87b4-056edf68e9cc
>> END:VCARD
>>
>> BEGIN:VCARD
>> VERSION:4.0
>> FN:J. Doe
>> EMAIL;PID=5.1,5.2:john@example.com
>> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:0c75c629-6a8d-4d5e-a07f-1bb35846854d
>> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527
>> END:VCARD
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Section 6.2.1 states that "[t]he [FN] property MUST be present in the vCard object."
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC6350 (draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-22)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : vCard Format Specification
>> Publication Date    : August 2011
>> Author(s)           : S. Perreault
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : vCard and CardDAV
>> Area                : Applications
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG


-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca