Re: [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3368)
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 01 October 2012 13:33 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841E611E8178 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.571
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xg5TmHUKxn4L for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B1711E8190 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:14b4:17b5:d72a:f2d0]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E49542663; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:33:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <50699B9C.7000504@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:33:16 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <20121001113148.42539B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJ+F4gQNTPRROrvAJeWs89yqrBMCq5rD6EWe5ZTU2iAxsg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+F4gQNTPRROrvAJeWs89yqrBMCq5rD6EWe5ZTU2iAxsg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, steven.ganzer@gmail.com, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3368)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:33:19 -0000
Le 2012-10-01 08:17, Barry Leiba a écrit : > This looks right, though I know we have a number of problems in the > examples in 6350. Simon, should we mark this one "Verified" ? Yup. Thanks, Simon > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:31 AM, RFC Errata System > <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6350, >> "vCard Format Specification". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6350&eid=3368 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Stefan Ganzer <steven.ganzer@gmail.com> >> >> Section: 7.1.3 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> BEGIN:VCARD >> VERSION:4.0 >> EMAIL;PID=4.2,5.1:jdoe@example.com >> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527 >> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:42bcd5a7-1699-4514-87b4-056edf68e9cc >> END:VCARD >> >> BEGIN:VCARD >> VERSION:4.0 >> EMAIL;PID=5.1,5.2:john@example.com >> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:0c75c629-6a8d-4d5e-a07f-1bb35846854d >> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527 >> END:VCARD >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> BEGIN:VCARD >> VERSION:4.0 >> FN:J. Doe >> EMAIL;PID=4.2,5.1:jdoe@example.com >> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527 >> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:42bcd5a7-1699-4514-87b4-056edf68e9cc >> END:VCARD >> >> BEGIN:VCARD >> VERSION:4.0 >> FN:J. Doe >> EMAIL;PID=5.1,5.2:john@example.com >> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:0c75c629-6a8d-4d5e-a07f-1bb35846854d >> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527 >> END:VCARD >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Section 6.2.1 states that "[t]he [FN] property MUST be present in the vCard object." >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC6350 (draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-22) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : vCard Format Specification >> Publication Date : August 2011 >> Author(s) : S. Perreault >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : vCard and CardDAV >> Area : Applications >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
- [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3… RFC Errata System
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC635… Barry Leiba
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault