IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3368)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 01 October 2012 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C5A11E80BA for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 05:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.025
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.025 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BgWcrSGzJMrc for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 05:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A4011E80AE for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 05:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfl11 with SMTP id fl11so6083095vcb.31 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 05:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=e9iePMI3ct33Zc9H2sBxPWyuMu/CGkA32kn7WrB76qc=; b=LZP+boj5pbTc4Lk4XC70BBo21KcDSpE/UMs2r6y2AsnSTa6LNXVYQ1GUIKgXtrJMTw dqlLzgj8VKpOUjgSEi1nN6e7Q7HXZtEi/HG0rjV9qvI95J2p9SwRRXzHk+E7PbsbFaQe 1NEt6rb6jc4KF6uUJIZuZrOhoXeCJsvdXCIx4WYxmatJD4kkUX/Vn4VE43JkMWXlX+9w WPffLw6VbLGr3Vp8zSfeaTaSzc90LnFY9JffMDulDcfZx0CJDhqmPC94NrSEOEXb82yd CNRDF/Pm8FovCRUTnIP4LboHIbavdI+Uw2Km65l2iDXWQewO163Lilui2xjjRaXLfrtf Jh3g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.173.130 with SMTP id bk2mr8515150vec.45.1349093873516; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 05:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.58.41 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 05:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20121001113148.42539B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20121001113148.42539B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 08:17:53 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: CAnHkb3jwBLnS47_y3-pOPsgiyg
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+F4gQNTPRROrvAJeWs89yqrBMCq5rD6EWe5ZTU2iAxsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: simon.perreault@viagenie.ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, steven.ganzer@gmail.com, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3368)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:17:55 -0000

This looks right, though I know we have a number of problems in the
examples in 6350.  Simon, should we mark this one "Verified" ?

Barry

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:31 AM, RFC Errata System
<rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6350,
> "vCard Format Specification".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6350&eid=3368
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Stefan Ganzer <steven.ganzer@gmail.com>
>
> Section: 7.1.3
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:4.0
> EMAIL;PID=4.2,5.1:jdoe@example.com
> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527
> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:42bcd5a7-1699-4514-87b4-056edf68e9cc
> END:VCARD
>
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:4.0
> EMAIL;PID=5.1,5.2:john@example.com
> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:0c75c629-6a8d-4d5e-a07f-1bb35846854d
> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527
> END:VCARD
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:4.0
> FN:J. Doe
> EMAIL;PID=4.2,5.1:jdoe@example.com
> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527
> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:42bcd5a7-1699-4514-87b4-056edf68e9cc
> END:VCARD
>
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:4.0
> FN:J. Doe
> EMAIL;PID=5.1,5.2:john@example.com
> CLIENTPIDMAP:1;urn:uuid:0c75c629-6a8d-4d5e-a07f-1bb35846854d
> CLIENTPIDMAP:2;urn:uuid:3eef374e-7179-4196-a914-27358c3e6527
> END:VCARD
>
> Notes
> -----
> Section 6.2.1 states that "[t]he [FN] property MUST be present in the vCard object."
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6350 (draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-22)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : vCard Format Specification
> Publication Date    : August 2011
> Author(s)           : S. Perreault
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : vCard and CardDAV
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email