IETF Logo Mail Archive

[VCARDDAV] Synchronization: experimental RFC?

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Tue, 06 April 2010 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482EE3A67A3 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 06:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9FQMeb62rQ5o for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 06:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D473A6923 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 06:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (ringo.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000::67]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E90C720E37 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:17:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4BBB344E.1090301@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:17:02 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [VCARDDAV] Synchronization: experimental RFC?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:17:14 -0000

WG,

Is the section on synchronization (section 7) experimental? Should it be 
moved to a separate RFC with experimental status? It has never been 
implemented. See section 7.2.5 in particular...

It would be easy for me to do so if that is the working group's 
consensus, so I don't care. (Actually, it would potentially result in a 
higher RFC count for me, so I do care!)

Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email