Re: [VCARDDAV] LANGUAGE parameter vs. cardinality and PIDs

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Wed, 07 April 2010 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DAA3A6AAA for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 05:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.228
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.371, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bKDnE7Atlmnr for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 05:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26CF3A6892 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 05:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (ringo.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000::67]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03D9620F04; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 08:54:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4BBC8080.2020801@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:54:24 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
References: <4BBB2EE0.6040202@viagenie.ca> <2DDEFC9394064E53BD759285A555AE71@Javier2> <4BBC7383.3030404@viagenie.ca> <8989BD112D9135A1A1C1658C@socrates.local>
In-Reply-To: <8989BD112D9135A1A1C1658C@socrates.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] LANGUAGE parameter vs. cardinality and PIDs
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:54:29 -0000

On 2010-04-07 08:41, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> One big question is what would the UID values be for all the
> "alternative" cards? Are they all the same or different.

I was assuming they would be different...

 > But the
> definition of UID in the draft implies that it is unique to "the
> individual or resource associated with the vCard" - which would suggest
> that the alternatives all have the same UID.

We can fix that description easily enough.

> So the idea of "alternative" vCards for language is problematic.

I'm not convinced of that yet.

Isn't it basically the same idea as having alternative sub-components 
like in iCalendar?

> However, one issue with the current scheme is dealing with items with
> cardinality > 1. For example I could today have multiple ORG properties
> with different LANGUAGE parameters. Does that mean they are
> alternatives, or separate? To resolve that ambiguity there would need to
> be a unique identifier on properties that would be the same on LANGUAGE
> alternatives.

Yes! That's a big problem that would be solved by replacing the LANGUAGE 
parameter with a LANGUAGE property.

Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org