Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish?
Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> Wed, 29 September 2010 15:05 UTC
Return-Path: <pigsotwing@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847723A6D82 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o2kuuGeY39wp for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7963A6C08 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so1223216qyk.10 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=euYDeLaIwq1Stwu2JjSG9I2LGSV+aPC9QdMJZ23Xg4w=; b=l2F93lmg23YsaDFFmcMGB5q58z7bJKMz6PbgttuoE3e1mvEeAAh9gEU6W7rjPXwqKC JHVK5W/IuI5e3Iw/I8rtDkL+Wd+TzxehLfpr6L2F60jAZV9OZg02WgO0vTqMsSYfSf5U +xy7ujPP1UfLLjm02TnUXDt79Mcc+qiMyhujw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ivlV5dAnVN9JCF0moNpYY0lTdQJo7rLxTtPHWEO+vyZGtLjD0sbn4ijON+kmV+ALsC FrSQyvgqvLC6Bb+p4nhA/nRZDxIIwTdO2L2Hwhg5pAIJJrNqHwnFg3GMGNV9B7i2x3qh 4pGcS/jNEYnKAtaghLBJWnzbEpjB7cFufrdWo=
Received: by 10.224.54.134 with SMTP id q6mr1225458qag.349.1285772746656; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: pigsotwing@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.187.199 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:05:06 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: iEtPLZu0__BOhJY4lVNWhls4774
Message-ID: <AANLkTikW=LbgzB=ejiL6BqkiFuWTkgZTG3JODf4yQObr@mail.gmail.com>
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:05:10 -0000
On 29 September 2010 01:00, Rohit Khare <Rohit@khare.org> wrote: > Similarly, DEATH. I stand ready to be corrected, but I don’t know of a > significant fielded system for “contacts” or “social graphs” that has user > experience with such fields. Names are defined by their uses, so we ought to > be able to identify more utility than merely demonstrating round-trip > interop to accept an expansion of the core vocabulary. Do we really have to set the clock back to zero on this one, every time someone who wasn't around the first, or last, time it was discussed comes along? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Andy Mabbett