Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard3->4 changes
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 29 September 2010 15:00 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA503A6DB3 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FMNv+jYsadFh for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC773A6E04 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar8EAIvxokyQ/khLgWdsb2JhbACDHZ8BFQEBFiIiqhyKDJJagSKDLnQEijo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,253,1283731200"; d="scan'208";a="10351659"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2010 15:01:14 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-55-92-159.cisco.com (dhcp-10-55-92-159.cisco.com [10.55.92.159]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8TF1E0D005167; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:01:14 GMT
Message-ID: <4CA354CD.7020901@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:01:33 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <mailman.0.1285713916.16023.vcarddav@ietf.org> <D4F81374-AEA3-4CB7-9A50-BED4B412AAA2@Khare.org> <4EA4C9A81F6E7DCA25EF49CA@socrates.local> <1EDEC283-554A-4C2C-8D45-D57E813A5A7E@Khare.org> <4CA2E8B8.6020208@gmx.de> <770AB3FD-D2F6-4777-8767-E0B0DDF7AA58@Khare.org> <4CA35376.7090102@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4CA35376.7090102@gmx.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Rohit Khare <Rohit@Khare.org>, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard3->4 changes
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:00:33 -0000
On 9/29/10 4:55 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > But that isn't different in vCard4 at all. Or am I missing something? +1 – I'm confused about the actual objection still.
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? NO Tantek Çelik
- [VCARDDAV] Pending feedback Julian Reschke
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? NO Rohit Khare
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? NO Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? NO Rohit Khare
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? NO Mike Douglass
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? NO Joseph Smarr
- [VCARDDAV] vCard3->4 changes Julian Reschke
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? NO Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Mike Douglass
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard3->4 changes Rohit Khare
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard3->4 changes Julian Reschke
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard3->4 changes Eliot Lear
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? NO Rohit Khare
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard3->4 changes Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard3->4 changes Cyrus Daboo