[VCARDDAV] Pending feedback

Tantek,

you promised something like five weeks ago that you'd send feedback 
"soon". When can we expect it?

Best regards, Julian

On 29.09.2010 00:19, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> NO.
>
> I think it is in-appropriate to go to a public LC when you know that
> there are serious outstanding issues of incompatibility with other
> active contact formats efforts.
>
> Rather, the outside "Expert Review" state[1] seems the closest state
> for actively engaging with such efforts outside vcarddav in an effort
> to reach convergence at this point.
>
> To be clear, I am FOR publishing UPDATES regularly and frequently.
>
> I am AGAINST taking the document to LAST CALL.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tantek Çelik
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/help/state/
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Joseph Smarr<jsmarr@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> NO
>> (for the reasons we've been discussing).
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Cyrus Daboo<cyrus@daboo.name>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Marc,
>>>
>>> --On September 28, 2010 2:03:38 PM -0400 Marc Blanchet
>>> <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Question: do you think draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev and
>>>> draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardxml should be sent to IETF last call?
>>>>
>>>> Please reply to the mailing list by adding a simple YES or NO at the end
>>>> of the subject line of this message.
>>>
>>> YES
>>> --
>>> Cyrus Daboo
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VCARDDAV mailing list
>>> VCARDDAV@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VCARDDAV mailing list
>> VCARDDAV@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav
>>
>>
>
>
>