IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? NO

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Wed, 29 September 2010 03:02 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0273A6BB5 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.546, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKh2huKVXqLb for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [151.201.22.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921303A6C11 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E77196F904E; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:03:27 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chewy.mulberrymail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4NdWXKlJ7rI; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:03:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.5] (unknown [10.0.1.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAF5B196F9047; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:03:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:03:24 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: Rohit Khare <Rohit@Khare.org>, vcarddav@ietf.org
Message-ID: <4EA4C9A81F6E7DCA25EF49CA@socrates.local>
In-Reply-To: <D4F81374-AEA3-4CB7-9A50-BED4B412AAA2@Khare.org>
References: <mailman.0.1285713916.16023.vcarddav@ietf.org> <D4F81374-AEA3-4CB7-9A50-BED4B412AAA2@Khare.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; size="510"
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? NO
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:02:46 -0000

Hi Rohit,

--On September 28, 2010 5:00:56 PM -0700 Rohit Khare <Rohit@Khare.org> 
wrote:

> I am concerned that vCardDAV is reusing the brand name and credibility of
> a very widely used non-IETF ‘standard’ to advance several dramatic
> changes, without taking full advantage of the unique opportunity to solve
> some extremely important adjacent problems at the same time.

I am a little confused by this statement. What "brand name" and which 
"non-IETF" standard are you referring to?

-- 
Cyrus Daboo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email