IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [video-codec] Comments on draft-maxwell-videocodec-requirements-00

Ralph Giles <giles@mozilla.com> Wed, 05 December 2012 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <giles@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E7221F8BEB for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:25:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GeOnQva6swuN for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:25:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx2.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6FB21F8B9E for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:25:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Glaucomys.local (unknown [64.213.70.194]) (Authenticated sender: rgiles@mozilla.com) by mx2.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97121F2181; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:25:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50BFBBD7.9010703@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:25:43 -0800
From: Ralph Giles <giles@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kevin Gross <kevin.gross@avanw.com>
References: <CALw1_Q1QKteQpcOGtDg7j-MRZqL93TH1KNF8+i1OdyLvCc4kPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPzd0H5C-Dbyprar5KGfABJ=x64_KnCwjTJTnV=uwSMss+PAtg@mail.gmail.com> <CALw1_Q2xoJ9MSmYNh3ibhqFaFS17+7LkfJsP3s0nz+KfiiSYAQ@mail.gmail.com> <50BE89FE.1080207@xiph.org> <CALw1_Q2NrLizB-pgKUVtZiPF4AC0QzAC6EQA2t5yNmSZxQUEPQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALw1_Q2NrLizB-pgKUVtZiPF4AC0QzAC6EQA2t5yNmSZxQUEPQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: video-codec@ietf.org, "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
Subject: Re: [video-codec] Comments on draft-maxwell-videocodec-requirements-00
X-BeenThere: video-codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Video codec BoF discussion list <video-codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec>
List-Post: <mailto:video-codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:25:38 -0000

On 12-12-04 7:50 PM, Kevin Gross wrote:

> We do need to decide how important VOD is. I'm not sure that wasn't
> ironic understatement in your response. My understanding is that a
> significant driver for this codec effort is RTCweb and there's not much
> VOD there.

Personally I'm very interested in the VOD case. RTCweb's latency
requirements tend to be a tighter constraint, but I hope this group will
take advantages to improve performance in applications where latency
doesn't matter as well.

I do suspect that the desire to treat 'streaming' and 'downloading' as
distinct cases will lead to a lot of VOD services offering video over
RTCweb.

 -r

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email