Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk about remote hubs, local communities, etc?

Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> Mon, 21 August 2017 17:00 UTC

User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.2.170228
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:00:27 -0400
From: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, vmeet <vmeet@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <D5C08715.822F6%lee@asgard.org>
Thread-Topic: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk about remote hubs, local communities, etc?
References: <CAG4d1rdcexVq9tzyUe9YkhxXxovtnXHri6QJYnr=CtTes7d-KA@mail.gmail.com> <D5C0692B.821CC%lee@asgard.org> <59D4CA68824B8D14C4B0C828@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <59D4CA68824B8D14C4B0C828@PSB>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/5-bMXsd64md5Osi7dvyrw5XLGIk>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk about remote hubs, local communities, etc?
Precedence: list


On 8/21/17, 12:02 PM, "John C Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

>
>
>--On Monday, August 21, 2017 10:41 -0400 Lee Howard
><lee@asgard.org> wrote:
>
>> Is there interest in getting together at IETF 100?
>> Maybe as a non-WG-forming BoF?
>
>I almost certainly won't be in Singapore but if there is
>adequate need for this to justify such a BOF, I'd be happy to
>participate remotely.  However, given the usual shortage of
>meeting (including BOF) slots, I'd like to at least see a
>tentative list of agenda items before forming an opinion about
>whether this discussion should take up one of them.

As I was cleaning old email, I saw four related drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-manycouches-completely-virtual-meeti
ngs/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-elkins-ietf-remote-hubs/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-elkins-ietf-remote-viewing-hubs/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-elkins-ietf-remote-participation-hub
s/


I’ve started hearing some consensus on where we should focus, but getting
some focused discussion around those drafts seems like a good use of BoF
time to me.



>
>A different question would be when people are actually leaving
>Singapore.  If the answer is "not until late Friday night or
>sometime Saturday", I wonder if it would make sense to look at a
>Friday afternoon slot that would not conflict with any WG
>sessions.

There are a couple of meetings in the afternoon slot immediately following
WG meetings. Later in the afternoon is possible, but I have to wonder if
people will have any remaining brin capacity at that time.

Lee

[vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk about … Alia Atlas
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Alia Atlas
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Christian O'Flaherty
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Joly MacFie
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Alia Atlas
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Toerless Eckert
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Nalini J Elkins
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… John C Klensin
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Nalini J Elkins
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… John C Klensin
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Nalini J Elkins
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Joly MacFie
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Toerless Eckert
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… John C Klensin
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… John C Klensin
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Toerless Eckert
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… John C Klensin
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Lee Howard
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… John C Klensin
Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk ab… Lee Howard