Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk about remote hubs, local communities, etc?

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 21 August 2017 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA34132A6D for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n3kVkEJsBrCo for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20628132A67 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1djp9q-0006DL-ED; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 12:02:30 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 12:02:24 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, vmeet <vmeet@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <59D4CA68824B8D14C4B0C828@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <D5C0692B.821CC%lee@asgard.org>
References: <CAG4d1rdcexVq9tzyUe9YkhxXxovtnXHri6QJYnr=CtTes7d-KA@mail.gmail.com> <D5C0692B.821CC%lee@asgard.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/fDC6xO2TMeqdEgW3PiL1cl_4QWU>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] interest in a side-meeting to talk about remote hubs, local communities, etc?
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:02:34 -0000


--On Monday, August 21, 2017 10:41 -0400 Lee Howard
<lee@asgard.org> wrote:

> Is there interest in getting together at IETF 100?
> Maybe as a non-WG-forming BoF?

I almost certainly won't be in Singapore but if there is
adequate need for this to justify such a BOF, I'd be happy to
participate remotely.  However, given the usual shortage of
meeting (including BOF) slots, I'd like to at least see a
tentative list of agenda items before forming an opinion about
whether this discussion should take up one of them.

A different question would be when people are actually leaving
Singapore.  If the answer is "not until late Friday night or
sometime Saturday", I wonder if it would make sense to look at a
Friday afternoon slot that would not conflict with any WG
sessions.

    best,
     john


    john