Re: [vmeet] strawman policy for handling geo-focused outreach: draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities-00.txt
joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com> Mon, 10 July 2017 18:34 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A2E12ECC2; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LO1NB6p-Qds0; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350CF128C81; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e7so54091140pfk.0; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+YkvJB2IBZ2afF7CsTqAj5PRXMzv2Rf9o9XXKxfdVrk=; b=dXWHgE93ViPiJM9X+WVje88pDY0Nia29P3we7odAELh1MnhtJItTPhAS5DmT9x/7mM 5MEeStrPpr7FzkC5QRwVA6y3TkwjDsO1r+wXOrfqnKXN5Yqgp/nzvgu0WLEeSRDgQqLB krnzHpxNb5XAw3WiFq/Ykf4x6nVeGusoMEfWS2+Wj/Y2yhu77T7v4LRbi7ApXirF9Pnk HeCxcRTfofTQBAlLpSbTktsCWOe0Dh6MBycK6vaL4MIXYx+NZ4WoDF9Xydq7VJYwryWd s7ORjFD8DJQ5uEPcN06WmdtpypuAcmMgBYBqreqP4fkcW/UDzkvWzi12GzrzChfUAoG1 0wOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+YkvJB2IBZ2afF7CsTqAj5PRXMzv2Rf9o9XXKxfdVrk=; b=QyPl3JMlZn9r+w8lvSHiIwkTNaomuxzFXMqXjwBWRX090UPfRT1NxifcCK8Qs3BUpJ F0uNBWFdXNT/JcKMnOaNfFobvphKqOY7o0EftFc8C8YwGeDT3RNZ/hznuu413azagiC7 471SVUiKAx8ou65IH8FKuCFohkM0QeRVjMahcA1mZhtmM7rwDC92GQVDmV8d1g4fUhyB T7rhZyreydH4rFV8LXSFeRNypxQjiD0U641OOiFE7IxSlTGvCCIfhkoycdyCSepeq7o4 BB9MgYfZxCSmd1mo/lQSR7q/h9Xd0YMtKIpodX1zUi5mfcGIXbhOxkCYsz2fOoKijUIn kDzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111c94g9KydPPqIcapNj2Kbhd/PajUOaR7kKLwfCKfWweFV8mf2X x7qF3FbTVQc+NZ6Xm2g=
X-Received: by 10.84.224.74 with SMTP id a10mr19993568plt.210.1499711678333; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbp-4.local ([2620:11a:c081:20:880a:d366:dd66:c710]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d18sm34780159pgn.27.2017.07.10.11.34.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: EDU Team <edu-team@ietf.org>, vmeet <vmeet@ietf.org>
References: <CAG4d1rd+YcKwWnzSU8f_fdeSahGt=NY87bPcRU8G8Je=G9=FXw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_i+YjRE0EFhoAyEp6kFv188v23VG55tFJQnp6FUf=ChpLg@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rfREox3fOpRBmBDo_YPCJ8T7pyQfFNmWWDRuqEQW9wFgg@mail.gmail.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <267eed1b-1157-dbf2-1d78-a25b596b9bff@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:34:35 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rfREox3fOpRBmBDo_YPCJ8T7pyQfFNmWWDRuqEQW9wFgg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="98ISFflIihXS5D5WsB9ht1r15TgRcu7Xt"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/R8p9W90RwaPycs6W4IrgdbBKdJI>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] strawman policy for handling geo-focused outreach: draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities-00.txt
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:34:42 -0000
On 7/10/17 11:15, Alia Atlas wrote: > Hi Warren, > > Thanks for reading it and for the nits. I'll handle those in the next > version. > Any comments on the substance? Definitionaly the IETF meeting is a plenary, most of the meetings at it are not (appart from the plenary(s)) we meet together, but not in plenary generally. The distinction is probably relevant, since it implies a higher level of coordination (meeting in plenary) between essentially unrelated activities then is otherwise the case. joel > Regards, > Alia > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net > <mailto:warren@kumari.net>> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com > <mailto:akatlas@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Here is a draft suggesting how to connect in the various > > geographically-focused activities into the IETF with light oversight and > > considering how various IETF policies should apply. > > > > I hope that it will spur conversation so we can determine the right way > > forward. > > Hi there, > > I have a bunch of nits and similar for this document. As always with > nits, feel free to incorporate, ignore, spindle , mutilate or fold... > > > 1. Introduction > > The IETF primarily focuses our activities on plenary meetings, > mailing lists, and individual Working Group interim meetings with > Internet Drafts, RFCs, and some structured text or code as > deliverables. There has been and continues to be interest in having > > [O] There has been and continues to be > [P] There has been, and continues to be, > [R] grammar > > ... > > Some of the motivations and objectives include: 1. increasing > awareness of the IETF's role in the Internet ecosystem, 2. > providing... > > [P] I suggest format this list as a list to make it more readable (or, > xml2rfc fail?) . Also, should either start all list items with a > capital letter, or none of them. > > > These objectives can be summed up as increasing awareness of the > IETF, doing outreach to encourage new IETF participation, and > increase technical discussions and cross-learning to encourage faster > and better technical output. These are objectives that are in the > best interest of the IETF. > > [P] I don't now why we have that last sentence in the above paragraph. > Seems slightly defensive... > > The IETF works well when organization happens from motivated people > who self-organize and the IETF can provide support and light > oversight. The IETF has an Education, Mentoring, and Outreach > > [O] The IETF works well when organization happens from motivated > people who self-organize and the IETF can provide support and light > oversight. > [P] The IETF works best when motivated people self-organize, and the > IETF provides support and light oversight. > [R] readability > > > > 2. Terminology > > Geographically-Focused IETF Activities An IETF Activity that is > > [O] Geographically-Focused IETF Activities > [P] Geographically Focused IETF Activities: > [R] consistency with other sections below, and grammar > > ... > > The focus is on growing a local group of people participating in the > IETF and strengthening the professional and social relationships > between them to encourage > [O] between them > [P] amongst them > [R] grammar > > collaboration. > > Remote Awareness Hub An event where video from one or more IETF > [O] Remote Awareness Hub > [P] Remote Awareness Hub: > [R] consistency > > ... > > IETF Awareness Activity An activity where "what the IETF is and > > [O] IETF Awareness Activity > [P] IETF Awareness Activity: > [R] grammar > > > ... > > Remote Participation Hub An activity that is connected to an IETF > > [O] Remote Participation Hub > [P] Remote Participation Hub: > [R] consistency (... and same for rest of list) > > > 3.3. One-Time Activities > > Some Geographically-Focused IETF Activities may be one-time activity. > > [O] may be one-time activity. > [P] may be one-time activities. > [R] grammar > > A Geographically- > Focused IETF Activity in a particular geography that do not have a > > [O] that do not have > [P] that does not have > [R] grammar > > Coordinator identified fall under the One-Time Activity Coordinators, > > [O] fall under > [P] falls under > [R] grammar > > even if that activity has or is repeating. There may be a period > where it isn't clear that specific Coordinators for the activity > should be appointed; for instance, it may not be obvious for a year > or more that the activity will continue to repeat. > > The One-Time Activity Coordinators MUST appoint a Local Coordinator > for any activity that the none of the One-Time Activity Coordinators > > [O] that the none > [P] that none > [R] grammar > > will be attending and running. > > 3.4. Appointment, Term of Service, and Transitions for Coordinators > > In general, a Coordinator should be familiar with the IETF and > preferably be or have been an active participant. For a new Local > Community or a Repeating Activity, it is likely that there are good > candidates for Coordinators. If not, that may be a sign that the > health of the activity is in question and more support is needed > before appointing Coordinators. > > It is not appropriate to assume that a Coordinator will serve for an > indefinite amount of time. The Directorate should check in with both > > [O] both > [P] > [R] there should be between 2 and 5 coordinators, so using the plural > and deleting "both" will cover that. > > the Coordinators and with the associated mailing lists or activities > to see how the activity is going and if the Coordinators are > interested in continuing to do a good job. The Directorate - and in > > [O] interested in continuing to do a good job. > [R] Um. It seems odd to ask if they want to continue doing a "good > job." -- do we want to delete "good"? > > > 3.5. Support for Coordinators > > The Directorate SHOULD provide support for Coordinators. This should > include the ability for Coordinators to learn from each others' > > [O] each others' > [P] each other's > [R] grammar > > 4.1. Keeping Attendance Records (Bluesheets) > > In the IETF, there are three motivations for keeping track of whom > attends a session. First, there are logistics and tracking the > health of the associated group; for instance, what size meeting room > is physically required? Second, there is documenting whom is > > [O] documenting whom is > [P] documenting who is > [R] grammar > > influencing the standards process by participating in the session. > Third, there is documenting whom is in the room for legal issues > > [O] documenting whom is in the > [P] documenting who is in the > [R] grammar > > > 5. Use of IETF Resources > ... > > A shared on-line calendar that at least Coordinators can add events > > [O] A shared on-line calendar that at least Coordinators can add events > [P] A shared online calendar that Coordinators, at a minimum, can > add events > [R] readability/grammar > > to is needed. This will provide a single place to check when and > where various activities are happening. Given that many IETFers > travel for business, it also makes it easy for IETFers to discover if > there is a local activity happening that is of interest. > > 6. Social Media and Communications > > Most of IETF communications activities are coordinated and > accomplished by ISOC staff. For Social media, industry media and > other communication needs the Coordinator should contact > comms@ietf.org <mailto:comms@ietf.org> for an appropriate > messaging. Through ISOC's support, > > [O] for an appropriate messaging > [R] I don't know what this means. > > the activity will be better promoted and aligned with IETF > expectations. There is an ongoing revision of IASA activities that > > [O] IASA -- first (actually, only!) use of IASA, please expand. > > > > > W > > > > > > Regards, > > Alia > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> > > Date: Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:35 PM > > Subject: I-D Action: draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities-00.txt > > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> > > > > > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > > > > > Title : Geographically-Focused IETF Activities > > Authors : Alia Atlas > > Christian O'Flaherty > > Harish Chowdhary > > Filename : draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities-00.txt > > Pages : 14 > > Date : 2017-07-04 > > > > Abstract: > > The document defines how Geographically-Focused IETF Activities are > > organized and how IETF policies apply. It is intended for eventual > > publication as a BCP but this is currently an initial strawman > > proposal based upon the existing variety of experience with the > > experimental activities in this space over the past several years. > > > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities/> > > > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities-00 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities-00> > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities-00 > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities-00> > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > > until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>. > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > I-D-Announce mailing list > > I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce> > > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > <http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html> > > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > <http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html>. > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet> > > > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet >
- [vmeet] strawman policy for handling geo-focused … Alia Atlas
- Re: [vmeet] strawman policy for handling geo-focu… Warren Kumari
- Re: [vmeet] strawman policy for handling geo-focu… Alia Atlas
- Re: [vmeet] strawman policy for handling geo-focu… joel jaeggli
- Re: [vmeet] strawman policy for handling geo-focu… Alia Atlas
- Re: [vmeet] strawman policy for handling geo-focu… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [vmeet] strawman policy for handling geo-focu… Alia Atlas
- Re: [vmeet] strawman policy for handling geo-focu… Alvaro Retana (aretana)