Re: [vnrg] [Sdnp] High-Level Motivation (Re: one or two blank looks on int-serv reference during the bar bof)

Ping Pan <ping@pingpan.org> Mon, 01 August 2011 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ping@pingpan.org>
X-Original-To: vnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926EC21F8D40 for <vnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.913
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.913 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apbogDkb5cas for <vnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og111.obsmtp.com (exprod7og111.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CF31B21F8D39 for <vnrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob111.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTjbC1M6nGjgO9OWm8N4pteFaqmvAdaN4@postini.com; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:14:29 PDT
Received: by ywt2 with SMTP id 2so1415577ywt.2 for <vnrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.108.198 with SMTP id i6mr221605icp.212.1312211668101; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.57.28 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E36C14E.6080909@labn.net>
References: <CAHEV9L3avPiHVjBtttTL_7VbNeJ=Q=oegot2A_m8snN5vzNsgA@mail.gmail.com> <4E36BE97.4030806@labn.net> <CAHEV9L2=F+GkyE_JBUXehR6CpuHeZg7RKzM0qwN3DLOgfZh=6A@mail.gmail.com> <4E36C14E.6080909@labn.net>
From: Ping Pan <ping@pingpan.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:13:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHEV9L2u7_TfnfwM_dgT-3Fw4ydn9Cs_jrGJuaFnCfOzFwie4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303bf98258ebc804a9731632
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 05:53:11 -0700
Cc: "sdnp@lucidvision.com" <sdnp@lucidvision.com>, VNRG <vnrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [vnrg] [Sdnp] High-Level Motivation (Re: one or two blank looks on int-serv reference during the bar bof)
X-BeenThere: vnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Virtual Networks Research Group \(VNRG\) discussion list" <vnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/vnrg>, <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/vnrg>
List-Post: <mailto:vnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg>, <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:14:23 -0000

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> > The goal is having the applications programming the network, without
> > breaking it.
>
> So you're saying the objective is an API to a VN, right?
>


Lou,

As you can see from the mail, the scope is to cover applications beyond VN.


>
> > This is not research, and we have no intention in forcing applications
> > to adapt network-operation semantics.
>
> It still seems like the same problem space to me, but the difference
> is/may be in objectives.  You want a concrete solution while that isn't
> a specific VNRG objective.
>
> In other words, you want the work in *E* not *R*, right?
>
> Lou


"E" stands for execution. ;-)

Thanks!

Ping