Re: [VRRP] ??: Re: vrrp faster backup
"Stephen Nadas" <stephen.nadas@ericsson.com> Wed, 08 July 2009 11:35 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.nadas@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CEB3A6F47 for <vrrp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 04:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.811
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.811 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.788, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yV9SFr69kLkI for <vrrp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 04:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394AA3A6894 for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 04:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw751.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.51]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n68BZvgl021547; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:35:59 -0500
Received: from eusrcmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([138.85.77.20]) by eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:34:45 -0500
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:34:44 -0500
Message-ID: <DF78BDF6956FDD4780D5DAD88A073CF402600F25@eusrcmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <608deed0907080059j6ee5bf64h571cd4cff93b5629@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [VRRP] ??: Re: vrrp faster backup
Thread-Index: Acn/ohb1gDvgjAIXQ5qvIKFK8i9RkgAHWjMg
References: <608deed0907080059j6ee5bf64h571cd4cff93b5629@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephen Nadas <stephen.nadas@ericsson.com>
To: Karthik <rkarthik.ietf@gmail.com>, vrrp@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2009 11:34:45.0712 (UTC) FILETIME=[17EF1D00:01C9FFC0]
Subject: Re: [VRRP] ??: Re: vrrp faster backup
X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol <vrrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp>
List-Post: <mailto:vrrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:35:39 -0000
Hi Karthik, Yes, I believe this is possible in some implementation. However, I think what you describe depends on implementation of functionality that is outside the standardized functionality. YMMV. Thanks, Steve ________________________________ From: vrrp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vrrp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Karthik Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 3:59 AM To: vrrp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [VRRP] ??: Re: vrrp faster backup sent with subject changed Hi, If the router supports BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection), then with the help of BFD configured for VRRP, when master fails, the backup can become master in few milliseconds than in seconds. Regards, Karthik On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:34 PM, <vrrp-request@ietf.org> wrote: If you have received this digest without all the individual message attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list subscription. To do so, go to https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. You can set this option globally for all the list digests you receive at this point. Send vrrp mailing list submissions to vrrp@ietf.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to vrrp-request@ietf.org You can reach the person managing the list at vrrp-owner@ietf.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of vrrp digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: ??: Re: vrrp faster backup (Stephen Nadas) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:02:58 -0500 From: "Stephen Nadas" <stephen.nadas@ericsson.com> Subject: Re: [VRRP] ??: Re: vrrp faster backup To: <liu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn>, "Arnab Bakshi" <arnab.bakshi@gmail.com> Cc: vrrp@ietf.org Message-ID: <DF78BDF6956FDD4780D5DAD88A073CF4025C71B7@eusrcmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Hi, If I understand the original question properly, the question is how, under expected failure scenarios, can backup take over of the master in less than 3 seconds. This has been discussed at some length on the mailing list (which you may wish to review) and please see also latest draft: draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-03 which should appear in the repository soon. The draft discusses this issue. Regards, Steve ________________________________ From: vrrp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vrrp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of liu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 11:16 AM To: Arnab Bakshi Cc: vrrp@ietf.org Subject: [VRRP] ??: Re: vrrp faster backup Dear Arnab Thanks for your feedback. Then when the priority value isn't zero, the Backup Router should waiting the Master Router time out. Are they any other way when priority isn't zero? Best Regards Dash Liu???????ID: 183475 Chief Engineer Office, Standard Development and Industry Relations Product Marketing System ?????? D206, 889, Bibo Road,ZhangJiang, Pudong District, ShangHai P.R.China, 210023 Tel:+86-21-68896823/ 13701767991 Mobile:+86-13828760990 Email:liu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn <mailto:Email%3Aliu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn> Arnab Bakshi <arnab.bakshi@gmail.com> 2009-07-06 20:52 ??? liu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn, vrrp@ietf.org ?? ?? Re: [VRRP] vrrp faster backup Hi Liu, As per RFC 3768, section 5.3.4 page 12: The priority value zero (0) has special meaning indicating that the current Master has stopped participating in VRRP. This is used to trigger Backup routers to quickly transition to Master without having to wait for the current Master to timeout. This is one way I think if the master router gracefully indicates the other routers in the network. Regards Arnab 2009/7/6 <liu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn <mailto:liu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn> > Dear All I'm a new comer in IETF. VRRP [RFC 3768] specifies an election protocol that dynamically assigns responsibility for a virtual router to one of the VRRP routers on a LAN. This election process provides dynamic fail over in the forwarding responsibility should the Master become unavailable. The router survivability capability provided by the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol requirement: (3 * Master_Adver_Interval) + Skew_timer for Backup Router to declare Masterdown in the VRRP [RFC 3768]. It will be more than 3 second when the Master_Adver_Interval was 1 second. In some LAN environments, the Backup Router needs faster method to declare the Master Router is fail. As if (2 * Master_Adver_Interval) + Skew_timer or (1 * Master_Adver_Interval) + Skew_timer. Are there a message type which permits the Backup Router could backup faster? Best Regards Dash Liu???????ID: 183475 Chief Engineer Office, Standard Development and Industry Relations Product Marketing System ?????? D206, 889, Bibo Road,ZhangJiang, Pudong District, ShangHai P.R.China, 210023 Tel:+86-21-68896823/ 13701767991 Mobile:+86-13828760990 Email:liu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn <mailto:Email%3Aliu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn> <mailto:Email%3Aliu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn <mailto:Email%253Aliu.zhiwei1@zte.com.cn> > _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list vrrp@ietf.org <mailto:vrrp@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp/attachments/20090707/1a92030d /attachment.htm> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 5863 bytes Desc: ATT2437946.jpg Url : <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp/attachments/20090707/1a92030d /attachment.jpeg> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2476 bytes Desc: ATT2437947.jpg Url : <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp/attachments/20090707/1a92030d /attachment-0001.jpeg> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 5863 bytes Desc: ATT2437948.jpg Url : <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp/attachments/20090707/1a92030d /attachment-0002.jpeg> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2476 bytes Desc: ATT2437949.jpg Url : <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp/attachments/20090707/1a92030d /attachment-0003.jpeg> ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list vrrp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp End of vrrp Digest, Vol 53, Issue 4 ***********************************
- Re: [VRRP] ??: Re: vrrp faster backup Stephen Nadas
- Re: [VRRP] ??: Re: vrrp faster backup Karthik