Re: [vwrap] What abstract type systems already exist?

"Robert G. Jakabosky" <bobby@sharedrealm.com> Tue, 10 May 2011 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <bobby@sharedrealm.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4B9E0875 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 10:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qEwQ+Uv6lA31 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 10:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.neoawareness.com (mail.neoawareness.com [67.223.232.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D878AE0834 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 10:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=neo.localnet) by mail.neoawareness.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bobby@sharedrealm.com>) id 1QJcEk-0006Js-OF for vwrap@ietf.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 01:59:46 +0000
From: "Robert G. Jakabosky" <bobby@sharedrealm.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:59:45 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <4DC85049.40600@boroon.dasgupta.ch> <BANLkTincu6V3SAgZEnDWGnU_-TQwFZLMGg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTincu6V3SAgZEnDWGnU_-TQwFZLMGg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201105091859.45796.bobby@sharedrealm.com>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bobby@sharedrealm.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.neoawareness.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [vwrap] What abstract type systems already exist?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:05:44 -0000

On Monday 09, Joshua Bell wrote:
> What I do know is that P1828 members have performed a number of technology
> surveys. The working group is not focused on any particular architecture
> for virtual worlds (as chartered, VWRAP has a fairly specific approach in
> mind), and is instead looking broadly at possible technologies to embrace
> as "best practices" for virtual worlds. The P1828 working group's
> discussion list is http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?A0=VWSTANDARDWKGRP
> - you might find it worthwhile to peruse archives and/or engage in
> discussions with that group regarding this and other issues where
> consensus on a new or converging design is not the driving factor (as it
> tends to be within IETF groups) but exploring existing technologies for
> suitability within a problem domain.

The archive is to not be publicly accessible, it seems you have to subscribe 
to the list before you can access it.

-- 
Robert G. Jakabosky