IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Use Case related to subscription sets

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 20 November 2015 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E87D1B390D for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:56:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GfS6hVIwzLVU for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:56:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E52041B390C for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:56:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ioc74 with SMTP id 74so129255098ioc.2 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:56:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bpvZK2xQvMiiYV74bvZon35n1C8EU1usa1AClq2zGnA=; b=ibKC6UxAWPvTtcYB98XLy3XlpcpEOIdTTNmwW0QvPw4KrJbT+jmLbazipOXlRJveDh 4u7m7DfMclRepeFlwimjLOHcc/tPygf4nCef8BalkYQJo6YDEInC+0Gh2I1c4f1F1l52 lcEYWSBUn67vQ8slDfxzU2oB2M+eQAWMrcCLjSHBkzBd9jS4lxxAmvZ5N4YozvNmvlwF E13g7rnwsrTgDlkGHRzDm1qIxg8MmiBMY/CA6SXhfYkLLPd2HZmyKrKQQd/Le9tuq+oM ZEXS+V5mrHbKiDCy0txVAaBN37LkMdscFLpEO0TB8b1DYKMl6lqaPlUOZCnETwKsSa5q Ztjg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.33.203 with SMTP id h194mr13636991ioh.108.1448038570289; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:56:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.155.139 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:56:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABp8Eu+OsXiEAsxOQpV_O-bF2o21upbJ14x8bCO=Y9TfgXOw2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <564C50B7.7070505@crf.canon.fr> <CABp8EuLXNQWmc0mnt-m_vBQhPuhhef5GDgbrZdyM8TKUZv+GxQ@mail.gmail.com> <564EF895.4020200@crf.canon.fr> <CABp8Eu+OsXiEAsxOQpV_O-bF2o21upbJ14x8bCO=Y9TfgXOw2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:56:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXwAVq1LxKH+U8pSvcO8M99Pg4xWQmpZP6=ctRJytZe=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/eB8LkdMCuI0RfeN7j9FKh_M6HP8>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>, Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Use Case related to subscription sets
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:56:12 -0000

On 20 November 2015 at 08:42, Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Either way, this situation and use-case seems accounted for by the spec as
> it is, since those wishing to handle this scenario may run their own Push
> Server without a low concurrent stream max, and unsecured so that a proxy
> may function.

That's only true if there were an explicit correlator.  In Herve's
case, the presence of multiple clients is hidden from the push
service.

In any case, I will generate a pull request that adds the explicit
correlator.  It's not at all complicated, I've just been working
through some of the encryption pieces.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email