[websec] #8: clarify/explain behavior when STS header not returned by known HSTS Host

"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Fri, 08 July 2011 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E96D21F8C66 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQTdLgElcPjv for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F296D21F8C5F for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1QfK19-0001m2-Th; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:59:27 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: websec issue tracker <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:59:27 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/8
Message-ID: <070.9ee40aea6eccfa2ee82e172d4a18d11f@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 8
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: [websec] #8: clarify/explain behavior when STS header not returned by known HSTS Host
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:59:28 -0000

#8: clarify/explain behavior when STS header not returned by  known HSTS Host

 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg00045.html

 Subject: Re: [websec] Some questions about HSTS
 From: "Steingruebl, Andy" <asteingruebl@paypal-inc.com>
 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:57:21 -0700 (08:57 PST)
 To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, "'websec@ietf.org'" <websec@ietf.org>

 <snip/>

 > My second question regards the UA behavior when policy changes. Suppose
 > a website has had the HSTS header for a while. The UA has a cache entry
 with
 > a TTL of several more weeks. Now the UA connects to the server (over
 > HTTPS) and does not get an HSTS header at all. What now?  If there was a
 > header and it was merely changed, the spec says to update the cache
 entry.
 > But if the header is missing altogether, does that mean that the UA
 should
 > delete the cache entry?

 I think we can make this clear, but until the client receives a new
 header, it does not tinker with the cache.  We do say the header should be
 present in all /most server responses, but the behavior should be that the
 value persists until set to something else.

-- 
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
 Reporter:  jeff.hodges@…                  |       Owner:  =JeffH
     Type:  defect                         |      Status:  new   
 Priority:  major                          |   Milestone:        
Component:  strict-transport-sec           |     Version:        
 Severity:  Active WG Document             |    Keywords:        
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/8>
websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>