IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] New draft of HTTP header-based public key pinning

Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com> Wed, 09 November 2011 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <palmer@google.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C881F0C4C for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:09:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.727
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.750, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2K-Rdr8M8j3h for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:09:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B8E1F0C59 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:09:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so113928wyf.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:09:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=QiDQaIXK1eEiZJs9htQW1prmgyctrtYx0TLggSc29mc=; b=IsmFVscLEb4clbnSfpuhUHkyB9pCynu9eFclYwe8UTSMTVITVLPOONo8W+P1GW/56A qMz1sbysFGYqtXkU2nvg==
Received: by 10.216.138.29 with SMTP id z29mr68462wei.4.1320869392625; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:09:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.138.29 with SMTP id z29mr68457wei.4.1320869392462; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:09:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.216.205 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:09:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EBA3B24.5060602@gmx.de>
References: <CAOuvq21Ne0CWT3Dzn0sutGDBg0K+efZhxmqBZiLuxbO2OwxnFg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71kFFpuooyiBTarvLT3VJigZhW0BgpQi1gMTn7zB=sFh+w@mail.gmail.com> <4EBA3B24.5060602@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:09:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOuvq20NEUAwPzStBa-kRVh4rUCFU6Ece1gN-kEb0FeFsweHGw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Subject: Re: [websec] New draft of HTTP header-based public key pinning
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:10:00 -0000

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-17.html#rfc.section.3.1>
>
> So decide whether you want to allow multiple header fields (in which case
> you should use the ABNF list notation used in 2616/HTTPbis), *or* define the
> syntax so that a "," introduced by header field recombination can be
> detected by recipients.

I'm sorry, I don't know what you mean by "a ',' introduced by header
field recombination".

What grammar do you prefer?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email