IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] New draft of HTTP header-based public key pinning

Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com> Wed, 09 November 2011 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <palmer@google.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BFD11E80B4 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:50:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id irRzhkKJt62Z for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97D511E8080 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so208604wyf.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:50:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; bh=L/JEjQKCm2YtOcEgT4ussYx3mw2ZecDuu+Ea3obcJTg=; b=yb+Vxu8gWjAJebv40/h70zhVQyHBZIrXTqpMqiky/Hy3l8I9lSZ3Or78SEfWh8yZP/ 0ir00Dm/ozj0Y+pdMyzA==
Received: by 10.216.52.143 with SMTP id e15mr2543801wec.34.1320875418470; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:50:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.52.143 with SMTP id e15mr2543793wec.34.1320875418346; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.216.205 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:50:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EBAF460.50009@gmx.de>
References: <CAOuvq21Ne0CWT3Dzn0sutGDBg0K+efZhxmqBZiLuxbO2OwxnFg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71kFFpuooyiBTarvLT3VJigZhW0BgpQi1gMTn7zB=sFh+w@mail.gmail.com> <4EBA3B24.5060602@gmx.de> <CAOuvq20NEUAwPzStBa-kRVh4rUCFU6Ece1gN-kEb0FeFsweHGw@mail.gmail.com> <4EBAE198.3020406@gmx.de> <CAOuvq20GYnrbwMQE9KZkNTFqETxJ4utKKzFNZ3ThQLnKbL299Q@mail.gmail.com> <4EBAF460.50009@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:50:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOuvq23qePapa2AA3k24YXRoGnCz9U5n9eOLOfXoMNa71n_BtA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] New draft of HTTP header-based public key pinning
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:50:20 -0000

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

>> Could anyone propose exact ABNF grammar that is acceptable given the
>> above constraints? Currently, I have it as:
>> ...
>
> I made a proposal; is there something specific you didn't like?

Your proposal is fine — thank you! It's just that I am almost
certainly going to write the ABNF wrong, and then we'll have a whole
long thread about that. :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email