IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] websec meeting in Taipei - topics?

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Wed, 14 September 2011 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E4621F86DD for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.131, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u-Bwhafa5j3b for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3377821F86D0 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so1932559yie.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0PhmdM4Z9vIwqpyLH1wdAq2Eswt0YsY+7GNvoTQPfnY=; b=qRn1CGrY49i9Ev46YyAMexRpq0jEca4jth8E4KyxeXIL0fQMHAGllsy5BelMRFc6l9 t4+8FlOXFKpTmY3hMIDmt87QnmBLD/IdDXKDuoPoJikoxROSlihu8/PdAukD8tijA+ea sdlL9sf/lCrgzaf6CpHogw03yftveonRmHxhs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.82.6 with SMTP id f6mr250957anb.52.1316029841707; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.120.20 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E6FDED1.9000209@gondrom.org>
References: <4E6FDED1.9000209@gondrom.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:50:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwjn1u4KheHecmf8YSO+OJQYXoD7-rC6GanJOhJ+1C48+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="005045016fd73a950604acec13b4"
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] websec meeting in Taipei - topics?
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:48:33 -0000

I would like to know early if cert pinning is going to be on the agenda as
that is likely to be the reason I would decide to go to Taipei or not.


I am not actually that bothered about the choice of format or syntax. But as
I posted earlier, we have four potential types of data that are security
policy related and four distinct delivery mechanisms.

I would like us to end up with one syntax and one set of semantics across
all four delivery mechanisms. To do otherwise is to take a ticket to hell in
a handbasket.


On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Tobias Gondrom
<tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>wrote:

>  Hello dear websec fellows,
>
> to decide on a slot and length for our meeting in November in Taipei, this
> time we would like to start a bit earlier asking for presentations, topics
> and ideas.
>
> Please send proposals and ideas for presentations to Alexey, Yoav and/or
> me, if possible until Sep-25 so we can better decide on the length of the
> meeting slot, but later will also be ok. Rough ideas are fine at this stage,
> anything that will help us in planning the length and scope of the meeting.
>
> So far we had great progress on the origin draft, entering IESG next week.
> So this will most certainly be finished by then.
> We could focus on HSTS and the interesting parts of "certificate pinning"
> as important topics to make major progress now.
>
> But I want to also emphasise looking for further topics and presentations.
> Anything you would like to raise at the websec meeting, please drop me a
> quick note.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Tobias & Alexey
> (chairs of websec)
>
>
>
> Tobias Gondrom
> email: tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org
> mobile: +447521003005
>
> _______________________________________________
> websec mailing list
> websec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
>
>


-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email