Re: [websec] #16: lack of explanatory text and no justifications for the normative language
"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Sat, 22 October 2011 18:47 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EBD21F8485 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qcVzWeTR+D2b for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DDD21F847F for <websec@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1RHgbQ-0001Kr-Fh; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:47:28 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: websec issue tracker <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff@tools.ietf.org, ietf@adambarth.com
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:47:28 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/16#comment:1
Message-ID: <082.069f7d2344511f067aa27b9de70dacc6@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <067.0c626f20ba70069d5bffe870f0af308a@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 16
In-Reply-To: <067.0c626f20ba70069d5bffe870f0af308a@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff@tools.ietf.org, ietf@adambarth.com, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To:
Resent-Message-Id: <20111022184729.43DDD21F847F@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:47:29 -0700
Resent-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] #16: lack of explanatory text and no justifications for the normative language
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:47:30 -0000
#16: lack of explanatory text and no justifications for the normative language Comment (by ietf@…): There's a lot of discussion of the rationale in this document: http://www.adambarth.com/papers/2009/barth-caballero-song.pdf I'm not opposed to importing that information into this document. -- -----------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-websec-mime-sniff@… tobias.gondrom@… | Status: new Type: defect | Milestone: Priority: major | Version: Component: mime-sniff | Resolution: Severity: Active WG | Document | Keywords: | -----------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/16#comment:1> websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>
- [websec] #16: lack of explanatory text and no jus… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #16: lack of explanatory text and no… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #16: lack of explanatory text and no… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [websec] #16: lack of explanatory text and no… websec issue tracker