IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] Applications Area Directorate Review of draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec-09

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Wed, 22 October 2014 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DF51ABD35; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Da969gCBYMWU; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og102.obsmtp.com (exprod6og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98AB11A9239; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com ([72.13.63.41]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob102.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVEe1UshHzT37Nzqqy4cmLAErYs8vX44D@postini.com; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:47:10 PDT
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9MDkvrU029266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:46:57 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:46:57 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: Bert Greevenbosch <Bert.Greevenbosch@huawei.com>, "draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec.all@tools.ietf.org>, "'iesg@ietf.org'" <'iesg@ietf.org'>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Applications Area Directorate Review of draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec-09
Thread-Index: AQHP7dOraLlEMb/T9k2LS8+NEgKgD5w8Hmfw
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:46:56 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F494F1417@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <46A1DF3F04371240B504290A071B4DB63E779CE3@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <46A1DF3F04371240B504290A071B4DB63E779CE3@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/GSolpZJ-XSDMyLkQDxPu-AFWBu8
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Applications Area Directorate Review of draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec-09
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:47:12 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bert Greevenbosch [mailto:Bert.Greevenbosch@huawei.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:39 AM
> To: draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec.all@tools.ietf.org; 'iesg@ietf.org';
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Applications Area Directorate Review of draft-ietf-weirds-
> rdap-sec-09
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec-09
> Title: Finding the Authoritative Registration Data (RDAP) Service
> Reviewer: Bert Greevenbosch
> Review Date: 22 October 2014
> IETF Last Call Date: 24 October 2014
> IESG Telechat Date: 30 October 2014
> Summary: May need an edit.
> 
> Major Issues:
> 
> None
> 
> Minor Issues:
> 
> None
> 
> Nits:
> 
> (n1) 3.3, it would be nice to replace "a 429 response code" by "a 429
> (Too many Requests) response code".

Thanks for the feedback, Bert. You're probably right, but since this is a nit I'd prefer to leave the text as-is to maintain consistency with other RDAP documents that describe HTTP response codes without using parenthetical text to describe the meaning of the code. We have normative references in the appropriate places to do that.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email