IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] Applications Area Directorate Review of draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec-09

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Wed, 22 October 2014 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866381AC3B5; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h66DrwAPHwrH; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og117.obsmtp.com (exprod6og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70FF91AC3B0; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([72.13.63.42]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob117.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVEe5K1vcFP4MZkY0iekkMXbYos4mdqyD@postini.com; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:03:29 PDT
Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.255]) by brn1lxmailout02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9ME34Ja018825 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:03:04 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:03:04 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] Applications Area Directorate Review of draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec-09
Thread-Index: AQHP7dOraLlEMb/T9k2LS8+NEgKgD5w8HmfwgABIuID//76wkA==
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:03:03 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F494F1506@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <46A1DF3F04371240B504290A071B4DB63E779CE3@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F494F1417@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <2FC7374A-6DF3-49F8-9FDD-8E8ADDCAA15A@arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <2FC7374A-6DF3-49F8-9FDD-8E8ADDCAA15A@arin.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F494F1506BRN1WNEXMBX01vc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/Qcdkl4DYcRIipxfwkLXVH_Tcx9Q
Cc: "draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Applications Area Directorate Review of draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec-09
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:03:32 -0000

From: Andy Newton [mailto:andy@arin.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:56 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: Bert Greevenbosch; draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec.all@tools.ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org; apps-discuss@ietf.org; weirds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [weirds] Applications Area Directorate Review of draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec-09


On Oct 22, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com<mailto:shollenbeck@verisign.com>> wrote:


n1) 3.3, it would be nice to replace "a 429 response code" by "a 429
(Too many Requests) response code".

Thanks for the feedback, Bert. You're probably right, but since this is a nit I'd prefer to leave the text as-is to maintain consistency with other RDAP documents that describe HTTP response codes without using parenthetical text to describe the meaning of the code. We have normative references in the appropriate places to do that.

Scott,

Bert has made the same comment on using-http, so the parentheticals will appear in our other documents. I view it as a readability thing, not necessarily a normative reference issue.

[SAH] OK, well, if the other documents are going to change we should make the same change in rdap-sec.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email