Re: [weirds] Entity name searches

Andrew Newton <> Fri, 06 November 2015 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A691A6F0B for <>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:47:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 010zOMLo8rTi for <>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 749611A6F03 for <>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmll128 with SMTP id l128so44268914wml.0 for <>; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 13:47:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CSyMNmHLNp8aRR8plMWuPp1ZRR8YiMdapYjnYXmvMH4=; b=XK1jYo06RXI5alChJPbAp0u+aHj7u9hY0iTcYTTBcGrHqYXuV7/cHfakYMd11XFi9s R8q2OmhlgbZGjS2hk8TtN1qgyenLOdlvcjMS8wlCCgGImYduHTXp2sKnkjp+vYkQgO5/ 5B6w9THw41qVzRY95+e8S6WwViI582UHq8vHtucMNhtOMDrkFgMoIWNa9wq9J1pwnIxy l4ajnow6fnISl3Gt7rLlhMmLN4j8ZnVYXdR5GMhIf2KVuGL/RKQGia1eG+cV6EJAssQP 5mqMnBRx2+/tV8MmuklN3mQjzsuiOmg4RCUG42Q7Vcd54y6UtkNv3gGF8poNN7ssPDC3 NAYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CSyMNmHLNp8aRR8plMWuPp1ZRR8YiMdapYjnYXmvMH4=; b=U/0OqHDhwUbr+b4rId8naS9efJ3JTozHZta6wZdVty2mJDo3gDYXdZkG2y9B2mULci F4o8wheqo3F9juTUEj/CQE+w0qGWntluUNasgUjv9SiQLwSnUc81TAP1S3vMabP1Wg7G u42LX8eImdOW2bjQJwsXhs2byC24AoX0NQourV1r1x2JRdgLMQLG8tPmWZ1xh2Pv0AnA tZlNAzfaCX6XqFIKPVefEBqQYeuQ8z8wuuS7bLuzi8l3MfAs6aaEDeWQG5Kkgt6VG48S h//QcNYrHoIbsTSw+92lvMBIzS4QCmuLnF0vkZzm/1CNdLVXIAL4k8EzDnAYo5ZPaU3W Sjgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnetQlUvOGjQeulWyYcuhk5KyMSdT1L2/vwlxA+5PUyNUBNZflhXhwztVR2HPUxa8MCQeux
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id r138mr13296246wmd.100.1446846456102; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 13:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:47:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: []
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 06:47:36 +0900
Message-ID: <>
From: Andrew Newton <>
To: Brian Mountford <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <>
Cc: Justine Tunney <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Entity name searches
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 21:47:38 -0000

Welcome to the world of internationalization, where the concept of a
last name vs a first name is not universal, and US ASCII is not
representative all the characters used.

Since you know the data in your database best, you should taylor the
interpretation of the query input to that which works best with your

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Brian Mountford <> wrote:
> And only names? There is no provision for searching entities by address,
> etc.?

I don't think that ever came up. It would require an RDAP extension. I
do question how useful such a thing would be. Why does anybody care
that a particular registry has contacts living on Mumford Lane in East
Westover? Are they searching all the registries for that information?
Do they need a telephone book instead?