Re: [weirds] Domain Reputation in RDAP

Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@icann.org> Tue, 08 December 2015 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.piscitello@icann.org>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290F81B2EE6 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:12:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2nXwKxp0LlI for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:12:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF5F01B2EF7 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:12:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:12:04 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:12:04 -0800
From: Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@icann.org>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] Domain Reputation in RDAP
Thread-Index: AdEtG45Y/Eguxg6XRvqNNe39ahP/CwASI9uAAADDgYABG8uoAP//6OIs
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:12:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CDE51C6D-A1DF-4758-A6C6-FAF142BF97C6@icann.org>
References: <CAAQiQRdMCUn1UNeNhB3XukBpnNMiCWLdyijgtytp91WsNEx07w@mail.gmail.com> <20151202170851.23051.qmail@ary.lan>, <CAL0qLwaCJs4jprZiUabYNkLByCmjd4EuH9nLbsHSPXD+T5GKSw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaCJs4jprZiUabYNkLByCmjd4EuH9nLbsHSPXD+T5GKSw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CDE51C6DA1DF4758A6C6FAF142BF97C6icannorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/llFoXmqw-XJPKdJGLnglDDTCD7A>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Domain Reputation in RDAP
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:12:08 -0000

Could this also be some 'car fax' indicator that discloses whether a domain has been block listed, when, by whom, for reason? While some ICANN heads might explode others might be curious to understand what framework or policy obligation this would imply.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 8, 2015, at 03:35, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com<mailto:superuser@gmail.com>> wrote:

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:08 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com<mailto:johnl@taugh.com>> wrote:
In article <CAAQiQRdMCUn1UNeNhB3XukBpnNMiCWLdyijgtytp91WsNEx07w@mail.gmail.com<mailto:CAAQiQRdMCUn1UNeNhB3XukBpnNMiCWLdyijgtytp91WsNEx07w@mail.gmail.com>> you write:
>Hmm... that depends. Is the idea to provide meta-data so a reputation
>can be determined, or is the idea to actually provide a reputation?

The former, I hope.  The latter would, among other things, make some
heads at ICANN explode.

I agree that historical data such as registration date, or last time
contact info or DNS changed would be useful.

+1.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
weirds mailing list
weirds@ietf.org<mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds