Re: [weirds] Domain Reputation in RDAP

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Wed, 02 December 2015 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1681A0197 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:02:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hDVPsCq_fgfw for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:02:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x261.google.com (mail-qg0-x261.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::261]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13B5C1A0161 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:02:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qgae107 with SMTP id e107so3032823qga.1 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 09:02:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verisign-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=OqksFWx/XrpeeAKXnoPZIv32ZHE3vUyo/ToS6GG/9gI=; b=aQmZ0yZiMrHI/2w/dWdxZpAM1R+avs7KMpwxJF+yf9KYiiwq/01vlQnyTzALHXu1gl f50X/vbXbxuDaD0AcZJbKKcY82i0GZsaVr9ize988KZAx4DwT14i7UQNPyqRe0r4+Xie tEC3uLlRqzIIy8C+/mcrnRym2GN9eL8IoItyovkjcioe8LZo8oWxgYEG/kgObd2h1eNO GO2c7U40Nm5+gHZ8kEjilq0FYfgXKhdWSnkKU6I/w/cPsI4NpPVFf2hRv5XRGxxBXcKd AlmYpZ72dqaNiRnpe0dtIM1+3VnfeXAhE3m0S4SUyCw+ybgCYOmkbGdRTdyqq/JP1/va jkcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=OqksFWx/XrpeeAKXnoPZIv32ZHE3vUyo/ToS6GG/9gI=; b=P8duck9NnhYDTM9ujbI4w9DkYtcCOjcUgZyA7OR91QWJfguS7YZHqRresuHuZks0XE Cu4kxrhPw+zZzYIKWg9tX3V49A5uZCvLJhG6JxKArxnjEV2xh6UFdmHrl3BaPJn7ptR0 yq52M5V6u1kgbWCYM5LCrqdI7JVAKWl/LUwkIHVXno+KKjH+IyE0LH1eA33h/KFakWFf z+/0WocnDUTKYU6wJAX0kUhm+rZsyc+G41fFooNtaL2qt7itOc5Iatm98N5YUERPnJuG pntlZ9C8Z1oNf6fZnHsOq/whgQ3KArTMmbIj1zkhDKNv3xGlk5aMwoRu1T4E4vDYUkBs pjmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmf5QD2sdAruUV/BU61m0wjdES4tzdAd7+Z1fEJBNe07YLVWGSSqH7cOT7AgHe715jwIG12S4tkO9Ltr0g0Qh0vtoqA0Q==
X-Received: by 10.140.43.135 with SMTP id e7mr5193395qga.11.1449075749163; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 09:02:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com. [72.13.63.42]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id a203sm567352qkb.4.2015.12.02.09.02.29 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Dec 2015 09:02:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01 [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tB2H2SXQ010616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:02:28 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:02:26 -0500
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] Domain Reputation in RDAP
Thread-Index: AdEtG45Y/Eguxg6XRvqNNe39ahP/CwAL2oiAAAobmtA=
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:02:24 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A1044EA@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A103357@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <CAAQiQRdMCUn1UNeNhB3XukBpnNMiCWLdyijgtytp91WsNEx07w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQRdMCUn1UNeNhB3XukBpnNMiCWLdyijgtytp91WsNEx07w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/ubNuc8nhLHCty7Dp_FmY0fYpzyI>
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Domain Reputation in RDAP
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:02:33 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Newton [mailto:andy@hxr.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 11:47 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: weirds@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [weirds] Domain Reputation in RDAP
> 
> Hmm... that depends. Is the idea to provide meta-data so a reputation
> can be determined, or is the idea to actually provide a reputation?
> 
> The latter idea is subjective and could be dangerous. But providing
> meta-data can be fact based and put reputation in the eye of the
> beholder.

Indeed, the former sounds more viable than the latter.

> It seems like a simple thing to do with existing RDAP would be to
> provide a history of registrations and expirations using events. That
> way a long held domain changing hands is something an observer can
> draw their own conclusions about. Just an idea.

It's worth thinking about. It might also be helpful in the context of WHOWAS-ish services.

Scott