IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Wellknown suffix proposal: csp.txt

hiburn 8 <daniel@hiburn8.org> Fri, 22 May 2020 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@hiburn8.org>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AF23A0E0E for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hiburn8-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CGm8EBkNbM_k for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88EFF3A0E0C for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id d7so7263264qtn.11 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hiburn8-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O3TKPRGwgq7AxsVaBdXg6/a7E0dzsp6EfTg0hPv4t6o=; b=SjuJVCG496+lukxQwzTtn+THhAO3BdYpFxKfVoCp04EEEJVPS8zCpP09EDeLwa7W1J Qb1v0cSm46+4azxG+DxM8saAXB4rrleZMfeTaNkxptrMqTi2lCtf+TTMRFOOgGTelqkl zzjXaoJ3aoMu7DEAnOEq6t9KFBLAeffWdZ8QwaHwLRv/MMKmAd6MJajMRUYn2Yei0e2S Q/mW4haOQ0k3kE8qBvKVb1nck9S2qmoT2XBilGytKreC7ric1DD2ZC2nPz7BJsYsP2rQ gYhmiEHSeF9dlH1/tgLWVeBiUULaidP0dxXenId5JQZx/ScugH0tIyoju371hTviRmGq 9CKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O3TKPRGwgq7AxsVaBdXg6/a7E0dzsp6EfTg0hPv4t6o=; b=OE5ZzJhsYSzLb9ZgasauL7jwYHT4azHLvOxCVqxBXyyGTOzofUJ+XdMGB1Xl1Ixl6u ftVOnok7FVU2ukeeC4bi7G88H48RW5PgdssWHMurpEasGfIyUyIn6IQWReQiOesR30qF uMe1hX1a4M+AbL7SxFMG18BDIl+CnYAq6fq/QzgXDfyAg6dhKHL7Kh4NU7/WzBLQNNsm AEMb90qwX24DuHpRmq4JzZ9BUD0xzUHBJVuXdJln+dfXp2rFdvLJfrStQIlY1CbZI7L1 e6xmFjH8FFEBl194RTooOLIOYu9ff4SILwgsE4rEaNv/PGoFVV5dEjok1PhyAsA+yu1R iVUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JaYP/Sgo7+KlEKKiqLovTmxnKiLADNlpmP05bQm2xRJn1AOCD xfhXmxo2Ne02tze82g+lA/izUw4v/z3+/rxGi6ziLViDOBoWwnzb
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9CdontN+A7ArP4LVKeSmn18bEMYkueF4R0dGJq/FaBk17/rRRvpE9Q4tOe2nJNDv9+cqrHV+TXHbFbvQ1Bq0=
X-Received: by 2002:aed:2253:: with SMTP id o19mr14382552qtc.236.1590117044318; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGHJ3LnuX97y+_2at=hLc43HvZzw_LKJRnwADGZB1J4hTksEEA@mail.gmail.com> <92C71FFA-37E8-451B-838B-AB9387CCD23E@mnot.net> <CAGHJ3LnAWUE6S36kR_Z5L7Zq9YezuTYQriBmXOX9DNzVYbrwCQ@mail.gmail.com> <A940B5C7-F837-4DD3-ABE1-33997CA6B4E7@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <A940B5C7-F837-4DD3-ABE1-33997CA6B4E7@mnot.net>
From: hiburn 8 <daniel@hiburn8.org>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 04:10:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGHJ3LnTEL+KLwqJdfjMYyd=U88r-iZ7CdSuinZUcTyco7JFQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Wellknown suffix proposal: csp.txt
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000094074405a633f93b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wellknown-uri-review/zXXEDLJJriIzqAZaljSUXcp5QCE>
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wellknown-uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 03:10:47 -0000

' A web page run by a single person isn't ideal. '
Agreed. I believe i can get support from OWASP on this then.

'I highly recommend it. Again, I don't think we can register "csp.txt"
without their buy-in.'
Ok, I'll do that now then. Cheers for your help!

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 4:03 AM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

>
>
> > On 22 May 2020, at 12:58 pm, hiburn 8 <daniel@hiburn8.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mark.
> > Thanks for the quick reply.
> >
> > I did intend on creating an organisational page and registered
> csptxt.org in its place, leave it with me and i'll resubmit with a URI.
> Will that be acceptable? I could look into starting an RFC, but i have no
> experience with this.
>
> A web page run by a single person isn't ideal.
>
> > It has not yet been ran by the W3C WebAppSec Working Group (I am not
> actually a member). Do you suggest I register and seek a consensus?
>
> I highly recommend it. Again, I don't think we can register "csp.txt"
> without their buy-in.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email