RE: Help re-marking an expired, renamed draft?

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 19 April 2013 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299CB21F87B1 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8n4T9wRcRj-i for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AA121F8C30 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3JFdKU0005541; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:39:20 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (50-76-52-225-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.76.52.225]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3JFdHpZ005470 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:39:18 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Derek Atkins' <derek@ihtfp.com>, wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <sjmy5cek0h2.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org>
In-Reply-To: <sjmy5cek0h2.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org>
Subject: RE: Help re-marking an expired, renamed draft?
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:39:16 +0100
Message-ID: <034a01ce3d14$0e6f52a0$2b4df7e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQErsKTfQM7JMFeGPqNfE3aPynDIHJoixoaQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wgchairs>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:39:22 -0000

Derek,

Send mail to the Secretariat saying "Please mark draft-jones-json-web-token as replaced by draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token."

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Derek
> Atkins
> Sent: 19 April 2013 16:24
> To: wgchairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Help re-marking an expired, renamed draft?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I received the following request from one of my WG document authors.  We
> renamed a draft from a personally-named draft to a WG-named draft, but
> somehow missed the window to get a tombstone installed.  Is there some
> way in the data tracker for me to get a tombstone installed?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-token-10 doesn’t say
> > that it’s been superseded by
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token .  I know
> > that the tool supports it, because, for instance, if you go to
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-signature-04 you’ll
> > see that it’s been marked as having been superseded by the
> > draft-ietf-jose version.
> >
> > Could one of you do what it takes to mark the draft-jones version as obsolete?
> >   I just ran across somebody using it today!
> 
> -derek
> --
>        Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
>        derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
>        Computer and Internet Security Consultant