Re: Help re-marking an expired, renamed draft?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 19 April 2013 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399AE21F9629 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x4+V7mK0VsjJ for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A9621F961B for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6E8F24078; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:39:03 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9ex+x5hfWof; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:38:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-173-79-232-68.washdc.fios.verizon.net [173.79.232.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1DEF2406E; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:39:02 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Help re-marking an expired, renamed draft?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <sjmy5cek0h2.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:38:46 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <06BBE1E0-3734-4EBA-99D9-AAB50D746C73@vigilsec.com>
References: <sjmy5cek0h2.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org>
To: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wgchairs>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:38:49 -0000

As the Secretariat to insert the Replaced-By record in the datatracker.

In this case, draft-jones-json-web-token is replaced by draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token.

Russ


On Apr 19, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I received the following request from one of my WG document authors.  We
> renamed a draft from a personally-named draft to a WG-named draft, but
> somehow missed the window to get a tombstone installed.  Is there some
> way in the data tracker for me to get a tombstone installed?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-token-10 doesn’t say
>> that it’s been superseded by
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token .  I know
>> that the tool supports it, because, for instance, if you go to
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-signature-04 you’ll
>> see that it’s been marked as having been superseded by the
>> draft-ietf-jose version.
>> 
>> Could one of you do what it takes to mark the draft-jones version as obsolete?
>>  I just ran across somebody using it today!
> 
> -derek
> -- 
>       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
>       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
>       Computer and Internet Security Consultant