Re: RSWG at IETF 119

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 18 December 2023 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5726C14F682 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:01:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V8Cq_5BwV1nF for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:01:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79817C14F6AF for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:01:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827B31800D; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:01:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id MaqG3i9SqeAl; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:01:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480C21800C; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:01:47 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1702926107; bh=kwZP1xxuGskSW7gMeoEJi4UFOxUfaynuSBtDDcUo29E=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=bi020cCeVe9AOzbURq3mBaBZZ+/Dm/lp/3ICJhI4DcnTfZE7jUwu4fQwCm+wFxEEj MfyO6TKrMfByVN1/yKiFAeqcF7UtrbJuG7RtG7jwfgXba4nIra8Dct+Zy6aJozJ6l3 tPH/Sln0ED+pkEfXtBpl2mgn54K3MUU5oJE89I/X0VJF6ShH6n8e1qrYGCaKacVXm3 gy5qCkZEq5LkNFh+9Fr/hwImggCk3PU49fJeDIpTZhI1jAkqIhJ40IzhMsLgzF4lal hd0gr5vH4Izd/O1/Z9AEd3PgNHt0L9oYJ6qOijdOdSzq8iYZSPGY6sLxjfqhzy/zQ1 wgmp9QAVBfYYQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44879133; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:01:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RSWG at IETF 119
In-Reply-To: <53829F69-9C40-4965-9C39-CAEC400A596E@vigilsec.com>
References: <170291799631.14021.12149647492302721036@ietfa.amsl.com> <53829F69-9C40-4965-9C39-CAEC400A596E@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:01:47 -0500
Message-ID: <22313.1702926107@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/gZMGPYAiOZnf4QtoftjbotIO_t8>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 19:01:56 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
    > What do you suggest?

I think that getting enough cross-community input for RSWG requires way too
many conflicts to be resolved.  So I suggest RSWG have virtual interim
meetings only.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide