IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] zulip.ietf.org is fully deployed.

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 21 May 2022 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E79C18D813; Sat, 21 May 2022 04:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2WDbFWJd9FaQ; Sat, 21 May 2022 04:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 839BAC18D809; Sat, 21 May 2022 04:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [209.171.88.119]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E48B81F479; Sat, 21 May 2022 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 40E841A01DC; Sat, 21 May 2022 07:21:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] zulip.ietf.org is fully deployed.
In-reply-to: <A2EBA5F0-BEBF-4A55-8D57-DA969028112C@akamai.com>
References: <d6243da0-1eaa-7406-de82-f485b692afc8@nostrum.com> <b76c4460-2b8c-e65d-7572-ade4c94edcaa@nostrum.com> <YoZnzkxSZRrVbyOs@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <A2EBA5F0-BEBF-4A55-8D57-DA969028112C@akamai.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> message dated "Thu, 19 May 2022 17:22:10 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 07:21:09 -0400
Message-ID: <887673.1653132069@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/j3mXRZTA2SpgixAQ6Vv-1flgT1M>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 11:21:17 -0000

Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > Probably because nobody thought to cover *all* existing jabber rooms?
    > I just connected and saw wgchairs one message from 2017 and I got "403
    > forbidden" for hallways@jabber.ietf.org Are they actually used?

The XMPP hallway (singular) room has been in use for decades.
There are 40 people idling it now.
It was usually just me until the pandemic hit.

(I won't be using zulip, as I don't want to run yet another client)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email