No blue sheets in proceedings; is this OK?

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Tue, 30 January 2024 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14319C14F71F for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:17:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H-KCIFXbkTRq for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:17:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppa3.lax.icann.org (ppa3.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F455C14F70C for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:17:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa3.lax.icann.org (8.17.1.24/8.17.1.24) with ESMTPS id 40UIH6CY029624 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:17:07 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.28; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:17:06 -0800
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.028; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:17:06 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: No blue sheets in proceedings; is this OK?
Thread-Topic: No blue sheets in proceedings; is this OK?
Thread-Index: AQHaU6iH2Wrh+D6acUeVcNKQ2lYuMg==
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:17:06 +0000
Message-ID: <1439E5DC-77C5-44ED-943C-B6DF8E27CDFB@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8FDB200C5522EB41B71A9529CEDC42BE@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-01-30_09,2024-01-30_01,2023-05-22_02
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/jk1p5e62jxR2yPjLv_jAKhQ0wwE>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:17:11 -0000

(Yes, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines> applies.)

I just finished taking minutes for an interim, and wanted to include a link to the blue sheet so that the many WG folks who weren't at the interim could see who was there. Of course, we don't see to have them, or at least there is no button for them on https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/wgnamegoeshere/meetings/ page. 

This bugs me, but maybe only in this moment. I'd like to know if $wg_member was at the discussion at a WG meeting, but maybe not recorded in the minutes.

Do other chairs feel that this is useful enough for a feature request that is probably non-trivial for the Tools folk to implement?

--Paul Hoffman