IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: No blue sheets in proceedings; is this OK?

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 30 January 2024 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA926C14F68C for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:19:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e45jwRDuNxWM for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:19:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44953C14F5E5 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:19:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-55790581457so5162497a12.3 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:19:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706638768; x=1707243568; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zLJ/+Y/nebi7rSqwXI7XQzYXSG7WZKiHjCBT4a8sJT8=; b=btf5jyNjLczfQsIZffdyoaS0jqrDCNsbeoHDBfke3E9DcAxL8wbLtfvZrjFO0G/wPY BkNoMdID7ZULF1K1EtFlRLmkYZyJkmtMSOUi+9vP+bpTkkdP7W5gAFuKaeh+NvX5BoHS sU9jKRDUBKb78FT8+gxyEw7AE2L24Hdsy4fz2AN8KsI+Dpj+NMAVLSQmnHX9QsDrnGOd j4P07UJ6CBZvONzOPcUEoNjkwSfOzg8gjNw1z3LlELzOa1mjsoQh13HBesEGvuvsNxEu i7bmtRCmiNV6cSsLUSjfQiTsCjzgp4/XmAQb/EbT5W7p/YGZVH1jeUNx8VT0XkMqqxBN APlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706638768; x=1707243568; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=zLJ/+Y/nebi7rSqwXI7XQzYXSG7WZKiHjCBT4a8sJT8=; b=P8dG19SK0jv/UepfQ7ud/xvtHVsSYIbTN4r+pVSyEPblPVS920ES95hH6NEvmebOJk gSrLXuzMp2lgSfwxvvzj7QcqwAzmomORPl0q4WFLSr0fdX1ToPE5T3i1d0hQ3B/GAiX5 UpummwtVjGVQ6qsfFqaqmDFbxPbNlGt9cAJdITxGmLARl9s/5kGtBlkdmDQfY0ftogNu XgRHbHZ2OKsgp1B5z2ZtM2r5zen3IePQORMy/00wUpD2n8EccthK9p8pkh9NJ9JfQhjO A5/ZQtq8coVm3N7WUkmbdrk7JLg+tgw7t9cc6kTa9H+2eILS3hGBe0L/YbhNRVFTlmdp Ev4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxILQd3JB1/40hvmp37Eoo5dxM0awfqbjpAgOCyMx1NRpw0kas+ /MEKqwNioWs84t32oRzxfQo2FkIyT3KOg5EAYRr+r/7Qtc5jInFBlPMUIQ46NHc9TBAPDTXobz0 doZpP9maOZuJfBLbwPZpOPO418g4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEAkeGndaO5qoyDlfAA7a7ITOd3Msf+3SvOT9k/YjBEWqpda8q8c0qloE0LkJltDD1BZu+aQ96gqukC2EMe4V0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5207:b0:55e:ef2d:952e with SMTP id s7-20020a056402520700b0055eef2d952emr5630432edd.36.1706638768095; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:19:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1439E5DC-77C5-44ED-943C-B6DF8E27CDFB@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <1439E5DC-77C5-44ED-943C-B6DF8E27CDFB@icann.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:19:16 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+F2PbTAMUyG=zFOJ3qN9m_h_fhYNE5QXicyr4-kQympjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No blue sheets in proceedings; is this OK?
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000088436a06102dcd01"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/tj8b63Eny7UYtfRLQ42byg6pNMs>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:19:38 -0000

Paul

They get generated by Meetecho, probably automagically.

Here are the 118 blue sheets

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/118/bluesheets/bluesheets-118-dnsop-202311071600-00.txt

tim

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:17 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:

> (Yes, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines>
> applies.)
>
> I just finished taking minutes for an interim, and wanted to include a
> link to the blue sheet so that the many WG folks who weren't at the interim
> could see who was there. Of course, we don't see to have them, or at least
> there is no button for them on
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/wgnamegoeshere/meetings/ page.
>
> This bugs me, but maybe only in this moment. I'd like to know if
> $wg_member was at the discussion at a WG meeting, but maybe not recorded in
> the minutes.
>
> Do other chairs feel that this is useful enough for a feature request that
> is probably non-trivial for the Tools folk to implement?
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email