IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Calendars

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Tue, 28 April 2020 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CF13A0D8D for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mrochek.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ONInf60mxmpN for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [98.153.82.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E574B3A0CEE for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01RK8KDNCNV4006DEA@mauve.mrochek.com> for wgchairs@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=201712; t=1588095474; bh=pXkHAEfKKD6Be7pIKw+0sKGD9ovdFtr97uDEt/27f1s=; h=Cc:Date:From:Subject:In-reply-to:References:To:From; b=Y6ydoYjdg81fcxR3kidWSYMyFSA7bPU81FyDg1ZH6NbtjtiGGDBCnvsZTFsG5Ub56 40EEtxvi76AnnYZglc1h/PbRv8aMfKPGfba4ZQwXnpr0wDcfJ9YABzJQPEtwwJSq88 0/mi/l72hYbfaNkMDJFGTd4N0Gh+qDRe5/vR5g6A=
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01RJM3XSTRLC000058@mauve.mrochek.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Message-id: <01RK8KDLJC36000058@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:36:08 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Subject: Re: Calendars
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:24:48 +0300" <FE827259-C8CB-4398-A0F6-32937C3544E8@eggert.org>
References: <CAHbuEH72B=bYyPSck6Sjp9C0Ob31qK39fHCgrJCTtuE1SRJfDw@mail.gmail.com> <4AE666C1-250E-4787-925A-C1BC94C7A7DB@kuehlewind.net> <FE827259-C8CB-4398-A0F6-32937C3544E8@eggert.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/uyRaSK213oBFBkdEKE38yNOUMoY>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:43:14 -0000

I hadn't noticed this before so I checked. Yep, it's doing that and IMO
it's a bug, not a feature. Please fix.

Given the (tiny) amount of data involved and the need to keep track of historical
stuff, I'd suggest a least three years.

				Ned

> On 2020-4-28, at 17:56, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.ics

> This works great, but past meetings are removed very aggressively. I don't know if this was a recent change or whether I just never noticed it before, but it's a bit annoying. (I was trying to look back at last weeks meetings to find out when something had been scheduled - and there wasn't anything anymore to look at.)

> Could we maybe remove meetings after a year or two instead of in the following week?

> Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email