Re: [irsg] IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Scheduling
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 28 April 2022 08:33 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D8DC14F74D for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 01:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s1OYST3k8Nlk for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 01:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AABDC14F74A for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 01:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Kppmp6MG2zDChX; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:33:46 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Subject: Re: [irsg] IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Scheduling
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <m235hxhd6n.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:33:46 +0200
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 672827626.443027-3574f392460b184f8932aca835fd43b3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA7F1F0E-3DEA-4DFB-9CE0-F3E0EA04FAA0@tzi.org>
References: <165099131006.2413.18420729450963190676@ietfa.amsl.com> <db6e3b6e-d4a8-3e67-6871-1fb8371f5c35@nostrum.com> <e8561c16-a730-38b2-7dd1-427270ecfb9a@nostrum.com> <47d3b244-d50f-0290-925b-24967026dad5@nostrum.com> <CALaySJLcTDwkRqr5s3qh8mdN-AB4=mosgt1q1WjvYEODSvavCA@mail.gmail.com> <m235hxhd6n.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/ytwxlJsltiwLUk4hJEJ7Ici5n1s>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:33:55 -0000
And since the damage from not recording an AD “be there” can be significant, I’m not happy that we are asked to rely on a mechanism that we can’t see whether it’s doing its work. Grüße, Carsten > On 2022-04-28, at 09:33, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote: > > > I wondered the same thing. I removed the chairs and the AD. The visual feedback I got was that it now says: > > People who must be present: None > > which to be honest seems a lot more confusing that if it showed the AD and chairs. Not sure what visual noise we're avoiding here. > > Thanks, > Chris. > > Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> writes: > >> The chairs, too, I presume, yes? >> >> Barry >> >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:10 AM Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: >>> >>> The session request tool issue has been resolved. Please resume >>> requesting sessions. >>> >>> NOTE: An upcoming release will make it clear that you should not include >>> your AD in the "must be present" list. The scheduling tool already knows >>> that a Working Group's AD needs to be present, and including them in the >>> must-be-present list introduces unnecessary visual noise. Please remove >>> the AD from the list as you're making your session requests this time. >>> >>> RjS >>> >>> On 4/26/22 4:58 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: >>> > Update: We expect to put a release into production tomorrow that will >>> > address this issue. >>> > >>> > RjS >>> > >>> > On 4/26/22 1:06 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: >>> >> There is an issue with session requests at the moment (all are >>> >> failing). See https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/3889 >>> >> for status. I'll send another note here when the issue is resolved. >>> >> >>> >> RjS >>> >> >>> >> On 4/26/22 11:41 AM, IETF Agenda wrote: >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> IETF 114 – Philadelphia, PA, USA >>> >>> Meeting Dates: July 23-29, 2022 >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> We are now accepting scheduling requests for all Working Groups and >>> >>> Research Groups until Friday, June 10, 2022 and BOF requests until >>> >>> Friday, May 27, 2022. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> =========================================================== >>> >>> What’s New for IETF 114 >>> >>> >>> >>> The session request form will ask you to estimate the number of >>> >>> people attending. Please make your best guess as to the total number >>> >>> of participants, based on your last several online sessions and >>> >>> in-person at IETF 113 if applicable. When we assign conference rooms >>> >>> at the meeting, we will make room size estimates based on the >>> >>> proportion of in-person registrations. >>> >>> >>> >>> Requests for more than two hours of total meeting time are unlikely >>> >>> to succeed. In special cases, you may request more than two hours of >>> >>> meeting time, but the IESG will likely request a rationale, and >>> >>> scheduling pressure may still make it impossible to grant any >>> >>> additional meeting slots. Please see this email from the IESG [1] >>> >>> for more detailed guidance on how to structure your session requests. >>> >>> >>> >>> As of IETF 112, BOFs are now requested via the Datatracker instead >>> >>> of the wiki. Please see the BoF section of this email below for more >>> >>> details. >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> >>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/_x2nc9Xqa5i1U4SuEFs3eggTCyk/ >>> >>> >>> >>> =========================================================== >>> >>> How to Request a WG or RG Session >>> >>> >>> >>> Requests to schedule Working Group or Research Group sessions should >>> >>> be submitted using the "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool." The URL >>> >>> for the tool is: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/secr/sreq/ >>> >>> >>> >>> If you require an account on this tool, or assistance in using it, >>> >>> then please send a message to support@ietf.org. If you are unable >>> >>> to use the tool, then you may send your request via email to >>> >>> support@ietf.org, with a copy to the appropriate Area Director(s). >>> >>> >>> >>> As a reminder, the conflict list options are: >>> >>> >>> >>> - Chair Conflict: to indicate other WGs the Chairs also lead, or >>> >>> will be active participants in the upcoming meeting >>> >>> >>> >>> - Technology Overlap: to indicate WGs with a related technology or a >>> >>> closely related charter >>> >>> >>> >>> - Key Participant Conflict (e.g., presenter, Secretary, etc.): to >>> >>> indicate WGs with which key participation may overlap in the >>> >>> upcoming meeting >>> >>> >>> >>> The Special Request field will continue to be available for more >>> >>> specific needs, and Responsible AD conflicts are already taken into >>> >>> consideration. Please make sure you take a few minutes to check your >>> >>> conflict lists carefully! >>> >>> >>> >>> =========================================================== >>> >>> How to Request a BOF >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The BOF deadline is on May 27. The intent of this earlier deadline >>> >>> is to allow BOF proponents time to work more closely with the IESG >>> >>> and IAB to develop their proposal before final approval >>> >>> determinations. If your initial proposal needs further work you may >>> >>> revise and resubmit before final decisions must be made. >>> >>> >>> >>> BOFs will NOT be scheduled unless the Area Director approves the >>> >>> BOF. The proponents behind a BOF need to contact a relevant Area >>> >>> Director, preferably well in advance of the BOF approval deadline >>> >>> date. The AD needs to have the full name of the BOF, its acronym, >>> >>> suggested names of chairs, an agenda, full description of the BOF >>> >>> and the information below. Please refer to >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bof-requests/new/ for more >>> >>> information about planning a BOF. You will need a Datatracker >>> >>> account to submit a BOF request. >>> >>> >>> >>> You MUST provide the following information before a BOF session will >>> >>> be scheduled: >>> >>> >>> >>> a. BOF full name with acronym in brackets >>> >>> b. AREA under which the BOF appears >>> >>> c. CONFLICTS you wish to avoid, please be as specific as possible >>> >>> d. Special requests >>> >>> e. Number of sessions >>> >>> f. Length of session: 60 minutes or 120 minutes >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> =========================================================== >>> >>> Deadlines >>> >>> Cut-off dates are subject to change. >>> >>> >>> >>> • 2022-04-26 (Tuesday): Working Group and BOF scheduling begins. >>> >>> • 2022-05-27 (Friday): Cut-off date for BOF proposal requests. >>> >>> • 2022-06-10 (Friday): Cut-off date for requests to schedule Working >>> >>> Group meetings at UTC 23:59. >>> >>> • 2022-06-17 (Friday): Cut-off date for Area Directors to approve >>> >>> BOFs at UTC 23:59. >>> >>> • 2022-06-24 (Friday): Preliminary agenda published for comment. >>> >>> • 2022-06-29 (Wednesday): Cut-off date for requests to reschedule >>> >>> Working Group and BOF meetings UTC 23:59. >>> >>> • 2022-07-01 (Friday): Final agenda to be published. >>> >>> • 2022-07-13 (Wednesday): Draft Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59. >>> >>> • 2022-07-18 (Monday): Revised Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> =========================================================== >>> >>> >>> >>> Submitting Session Agendas >>> >>> >>> >>> Please submit the agendas for your sessions as early as possible >>> >>> using the "IETF Meeting Materials Management Tool," a Web-based tool >>> >>> for making your meeting agenda, minutes, and presentation slides >>> >>> available to the community before, during, and after an IETF >>> >>> meeting. If you are a BOF chair, then you may use the tool to >>> >>> submit a revised agenda as well as other materials for your BOF once >>> >>> the BOF has been approved. >>> >>> >>> >>> The URL for the tool is: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/secr/proceedings/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Agendas submitted via the tool will be available to the public on >>> >>> the "IETF Meeting Materials" webpage as soon as they are submitted. >>> >>> >>> >>> The URL for the "IETF 114 Meeting Materials" Web page is: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/114/materials.html >>> >>> >>> >>> If you are a Working Group chair, then you already have accounts on >>> >>> the "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool" and the "IETF Meeting >>> >>> Materials Management Tool." The same User ID and password will work >>> >>> for both tools. If you are a BOF chair who is not also a Working >>> >>> Group chair, then you will be given an account on the "IETF Meeting >>> >>> Materials Management Tool" when your BOF has been approved. If you >>> >>> require assistance in using either tool, or wish to report a bug, >>> >>> then please send a message to support@ietf.org. >>> >>> >>> >>> =============================================================== >>> >>> Area Director Contact Information >>> >>> >>> >>> IETF Chair >>> >>> Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> Applications and Real-Time Area (art) >>> >>> Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> >>> >>> Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> Internet Area (int) >>> >>> Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> >>> >>> Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Operations & Management Area (ops) >>> >>> Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> >>> >>> Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Routing Area (rtg) >>> >>> Andrew Alston <andrew-ietf@liquid.tech> >>> >>> John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> >>> >>> Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Security Area (sec) >>> >>> Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> >>> >>> Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io> >>> >>> >>> >>> Transport Area (tsv) >>> >>> Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> >>> >>> Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >
- IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Scheduling IETF Agenda
- Re: IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Scheduling Robert Sparks
- Re: IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Scheduling Robert Sparks
- Re: IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Scheduling Robert Sparks
- Re: IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Scheduling Barry Leiba
- Re: IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Scheduling Christian Hopps
- Re: [irsg] IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Sche… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [irsg] IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Sche… Robert Sparks
- Re: [irsg] IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Sche… Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] IETF 114 - Working Group/BOF/IRTF Sche… Carsten Bormann